This is actually pretty similar to what some coworkers visiting from EU wanted to do.
They were here on a two week work trip and I asked them what they were doing for their weekend. It was something like “We rented a car and are going to go to New Orleans, then to Nashville, up to New York City, over to the Grand canyon, and maybe San Francisco if we have time before we head back to the office”
I had to explain that the state we were in was larger than their country and they couldn’t cover that much ground in two days even if they only drove and didn’t stop once.
We had a good laugh and then just did a hike on Saturday :)
Edit : “in Europe 100km is a long distance and in the US 100 years is a long time”. Forget where I heard that but it seems accurate
That is a British saying about Americans vs. Brits.
I once saw a post from an American guy visiting family in Germany. They borrowed him a car so he could visit other family about 400KM away.
The family that owned the car spend an entire day getting it checked out by a mechanic, making sure all the fluids where fine, getting the tire pressure just right, etc.
He thought it was pretty funny because he drove double that distance every week just to go to work.
Why would you even go there ? Go to Canada
LGTM!
Conversely, I, as an American who had the opportunity to spend a few months in Germany, was surprised at how close all the countries were.
Great culture in all the places I went (Brussels and Prague were my two standout favorites!) Traveling was hella cheap. The food was fire everywhere I went. The architecture was INCREDIBLE. And the knowledge that you could go to the hospital for less than $100 was nuts. Don’t even get me started on how legitimately cool it is to sit in a 1000 year old pub.
I didn’t want to come back. I nearly cried when I got the return flight info.
It still shocks me to tell people “Yeah, I lived in Germany for a bit and some weekends we would fuck off to France.”
I loved Prague too. Had a local guide that took me to cool places, I drank a lot. 👍
The borders of European countries are great because there’s all this security infrastructure that they’ve built but then they don’t use any of it. There’s always just a bunch of ballads and you have to drive around little security checkpoints but there’s never anyone around.
My personal favourite is Geneva which is kind of just an extended bit of Switzerland because the city was already there, but really by any logical sense it should be in France. So they deal with that by basically just ignoring it, and people just pop to and fro all the time.
There are often crossings where the infrastructure is a road-side sign. Interstate crossings at state borders are often more significant.
it’s actually not as bad as I thought it would be
Remember that mapping programs only give “travel time”, not “total trip time.” that 19 hour drive from NY to FL is 19 hours in the car, on the highway. Realistically, that’s a 2-3 day trip.
FL to NV is, likewise, 37 hours on the highway. So, same as your office job for a week, but instead of working you’re just driving in a car.
With a little elbow grease and knowing where cops might be, you could work those numbers down. ;)
I have to have the road trip conversation with friends before we do anything. It’s like, do we want to make this leisurely and the drive is fun, because that’s going to need an itinerary and planned stops, or is the destination all that matters? Because I can make that 37 hour drive in about 38, give or take. Most of the time, I’d prefer it that way. Roadside destinations and ‘gotta stop here’ restaurants are always pretty lame, in my experience.
Ah, to be young and childless and have sufficient privilege where staying awake for a day and a half doesn’t mess you up for the whole week
It only assumes 120 km/h average speed for 55h
I sadly see this all the time unironically. Met a German family who arrived in North Carolina with plans to go to Disney Land. Not World. Land
“Isn’t California just on the other side of the country?”
Yeah it is
How do people not check driving times in this modern age?
America is pretty unique in size. If you’re used to shorter trips even overestimating wouldn’t be half the drive through america. Especially Europeans as a long drive is anything over 20m when its measured in hours they’re considering booking accommodations for sleep and such. The perception of time is incredibly different.
Canada is as wide… And in a sense longer because everything is so sparse.
Unique in size? Lol the US is big, there are lots of other big countries
It’s the second biggest “Western” country. It’s about twice as big as the EU, about as big as the whole of Europe with about the same population, so it’s mostly empty in the middle.
The obverse would be an American who wants to go to Europe, start out in Madrid, lunch in Copenhagen and fly back from Istambul.
But the US isn’t unique in size. It’s right next to two big countries, with Canada being even bigger, Europeand are familiar with Russia that’s the biggest country in the world, it’s not like people don’t know about China, Brazil and how they’re yuge…
Technically the US is unique in size. Name another nation that is 9.8 million km2. Canada is 10 million km2,Russia is 17.1 million km2, China is is 9.6 million…
So to say it is ‘unique in size’ is technically correct, the best kind of correct!
Hah well you got me there
That’s why I’m saying “second biggest”, that doesn’t mean it’s unique.
European here, although our countries are smaller. 20 mins is quite obviously a short drive.
UK is pretty small but it still takes 7 Hours to get from Glasgow to london and I can’t imagine anyone booking overnight accommodation for that drive. That’s two major cities with 100% motorway/freeway driving, I haven’t even brought up Cornwall.
I drive 5h for family within England on a monthly basis.
Your comment is naive.
My family that still lives there stay overnight for trips like that. Me on the other hand: drove across Canada and would drive 4 hours, nap for 20 minutes, repeat…because hotels were expensive and my plan of campsite tenting overnight was just too much setup and take down after the first day.
Eh id still be inclined to stay over in Manchester or something to break that up, especially on holiday.
The way I try to communicate it is to ask them to imagine someone taking a vacation to the whole EU, because America is much closer in scale to that
Their transportation:
upvote for Gulf of Mexico
Ahem, it’s the Gulf of America. Please get your facts right
Silly! The game you play when the facts keep changing and the rules don’t matter
why is this being downvoted, have y’all never heard of sarcasm?
It’s a lazy joke that the other person already made better.
The sarcasm/joke is obvious, it just wasn’t funny.
Sorry, I should have tagged it properly.
Warning! Sarcasm ahead.
<sarcasm>Ahem, it’s the Gulf of America. Please get your facts right</sarcasm>
Edit: Jerboa eating me tags. Let us try it this way:
<sarcasm>Ahem, it’s the Gulf of America. Please get your facts right</sarcasm>
Edit2: <p contenteditable=“true”>while we’re at it, why not try <mark>further</mark></p>
Edit3: Thanks for the gold, kind <del>strangler</del> <ins>stranger</ins>
There is absolutely no way to determine if somebody is being facetious or serious over the Internet without further context. (Use a damn /s ffs)
Who could be serious saying that ??? (I don’t think Donald is posting here onlemmy)
77 million people voted for trump in 2024. Even if you subtract the 50% that can’t write, that leaves more than 38 million people who could seriously say this on Lemmy. Don’t pretend that the orange clown ruined the country all by himself.
Have you seen the state of the world today?
Let’s call it the gulf of middle earth
Nope, it’s the Gulf of America. He said so. Now quit your anti-US retorics lest you be deported.
It’s pronounced Gulf of Mexico
Is this one of those weird maps with the equator going through Florida?
Gondor is going to need a lot more aid to move that gulf to the middle…
Only if marlago is designated americas rectum.
Palm Beach is full of [rich] assholes so I would say this tracks.
Urectum
Damn near killed em.
I had relatives over from wales visiting my grandmother in canberra. "Come, drive up for the day! "
Bitch i live in melbourne. The drive alone is longer than your entire “kingdom”
Ha, I had to drive 8 hours to get to the nearest airport when some one on site had a personal emergency
Wales is a principality. Victoria is about the same area as England btw.
It’s a constituent country of UK. Principality ended in the mid 1500s, and became an official country in 2011.
Nope.
Victoria (Australia): About 228,000 km².
United Kingdom: About 243,610 km².
England: About 130,281 km².Wales is a part of the UK, the “kingdom” of which i speak. Or did you think i was talking of the lands of Llywelyn the last?
(Btw: the uk is about 600km long. Melbs to canberra is 665km)
😂😂😂 They’re in for a surprise. I can drive 2 hours and still be in my state.
I can drive 2h and be in jail (I don’t have my driver’s license).
I can drive 7 hours and still be on the same roundabout.
That’s not really impressive. I can drive 5 hours and still be in the same state. In Germany.
I can drive 2 hours in still be in Austin.
could that really be called driving?
I’d guess you could find a 2 hour straight line in any state without crossing a border, except maybe Rhode Island.
I can drive for two hours and still be in the same roundabout.
I had a car like that once.
I can drive 8 hours and still be in my shithole state and it’s not even Texas.
Dam, if I drive an hour the right direction in in Sweden
Same here, but that’s where I started.
I can drive two hours and still be in my county! (It’s stupid).
We have like 120 counties. Dunno why.
More like 190 or so.
Shout out the 1 hour 45 minute drive from JFK to just over the bridge into Jersey
Lmao cycling is faster according to Google
There’s a reason why New Yorkers are much fitter than the average American lol.
Holy crap, just shoot me out a cannon, I’ll get there sooner or die, either is preferable
Coming into the city through the tunnel was wild. Huge contrast in the amount of traffic.
I walked around Jersey City for Pokemon Go fest, and it was a ghost town. It was so surreal lol. Right off the PATH train there’s no one.
Fly into Newark. Nobody in nj uses JFK or laguardia.
In OP’s image they “land” in NYC and drive to Miami. You would drive the route I posted to leave NYC.
We had family visit from the UK many years ago. They said after they visited Niagara Falls, they wanted to “pop over” to Prince Edward Island to see Anne of Green Gables. That is an 18h drive if you don’t even stop to pee. They finally realized how big Canada really is when somebody showed them a map of England superimposed on a map of Canada.
I mean, it is also about how much time you have in the vacation and how much it feels like a “once in a lifetime” thing, where you take more hardships to check all the “highlights”. Like, when we spend 2 weeks in Australia we drove crazy distances, because I don’t know whether I will ever be there again. Same for US tourists in Europe, even in this thread “oh, we did Lissabon, London, Paris, Prague and Zagreb”. No European would ever cram that into 4 weeks. But if you have the opportunity ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
When backpacking in China we went from Shanghai to the border of Tibet. Crazy distances again, but we wanted to cover snow capped mountains and Shanghai, solely because of “well, while we’re at it”. I mean, it felt like we already travelled half-way back home, only to come back to Shanghai to take the return trip.
Anyway, TL;DR: I don’t think it’s underestimating the size, but a FOMO on a “once in a lifetime” vacation.
Why not just take the High Speed Rail and get there in 45 minutes instead?
US High Speed Rail:
Hey now, don’t knock the Big Boy. He could reach 80mph, that’s much faster than most of our rail in the US.
Oh, I’m just kidding. I’ve only gotten to see 4014 up close once but man is it impressive.
back when America knew how to dominate the rail scene
The US still dominates freight rail.
When this baby hits 88Mph, you’re gonna see some serious shit
Eastwood, Clint Eastwood.
Nice to meet you Mr Estwoud.
idk if I want to ride a train that goes at Mach 2.3 personally.
I’ll wait until it’s proven, then I’ll go find a g suit.
That’s gonna be a while. Current speed record from what I see for passenger trains is around 350 miles per hour. The quick math I did for getting from NYC to Miami in 45 minutes needed like 1,700mph. From what I’m seeing even the experimental stuff right now doesn’t get above 400mph.
SR-71 has entered the chat.
Laughs in supercruise
Concorde is a tailless aircraft design with a narrow fuselage permitting four-abreast seating for 92 to 128 passengers, an ogival delta wing, and a droop nose for landing visibility. It is powered by four Rolls-Royce/Snecma Olympus 593 turbojets with variable engine intake ramps, and reheat for take-off and acceleration to supersonic speed. Constructed from aluminium, it was the first airliner to have analogue fly-by-wire flight controls. The airliner had transatlantic range while supercruising at twice the speed of sound for 75% of the distance.[5]
The fastest transatlantic airliner flight was from New York JFK to London Heathrow on 7 February 1996, aided by a 175 mph (282 km/h) tailwind, by the British Airways G-BOAD, in 2 hours, 52 minutes, 59 seconds from take-off to touchdown.[227] On 13 February 1985, a Concorde charter flight flew from London Heathrow to Sydney in a time of 17 hours, 3 minutes and 45 seconds, including refuelling stops.[228][229]
Supercruise is sustained supersonic flight of a supersonic aircraft without using afterburner. Many supersonic military aircraft are not capable of supercruise and can maintain Mach 1+ flight only in short bursts with afterburners. Aircraft such as the SR-71 Blackbird are designed to cruise at supersonic speed with afterburners enabled.
Some fighter jets are capable of supercruise but only at high altitudes and in a clean configuration, so the term may imply “a significant increase in effective combat speed with a full weapons load over existing types”.[1] One of the pre-eminent military examples of supercruise is the F-22 Raptor, for which supercruise was defined as “the ability to cruise at speeds of one and a half times the speed of sound or greater without the use of afterburner for extended periods in combat configuration.”[2]
One of the best-known examples of an aircraft capable of supercruise, and the only notable non-military example, was the Concorde. Due to its long service as a commercial airliner, the Concorde holds the record for the most time spent supersonic; more than all other western aircraft combined.[3]
Laughs in mach 3.2
Try to keep up.
There were a lot of things we couldn’t do in an SR-71, but we were the fastest guys on the block and loved reminding our fellow aviators of this fact. People often asked us if, because of this fact, it was fun to fly the jet. Fun would not be the first word I would use to describe flying this plane. Intense, maybe. Even cerebral. But there was one day in our Sled experience when we would have to say that it was pure fun to be the fastest guys out there, at least for a moment. It occurred when Walt and I were flying our final training sortie. We needed 100 hours in the jet to complete our training and attain Mission Ready status. Somewhere over Colorado we had passed the century mark. We had made the turn in Arizona and the jet was performing flawlessly. My gauges were wired in the front seat and we were starting to feel pretty good about ourselves, not only because we would soon be flying real missions but because we had gained a great deal of confidence in the plane in the past ten months. Ripping across the barren deserts 80,000 feet below us, I could already see the coast of California from the Arizona border. I was, finally, after many humbling months of simulators and study, ahead of the jet. I was beginning to feel a bit sorry for Walter in the back seat. There he was, with no really good view of the incredible sights before us, tasked with monitoring four different radios. This was good practice for him for when we began flying real missions, when a priority transmission from headquarters could be vital. It had been difficult, too, for me to relinquish control of the radios, as during my entire flying career I had controlled my own transmissions. But it was part of the division of duties in this plane and I had adjusted to it. I still insisted on talking on the radio while we were on the ground, however. Walt was so good at many things, but he couldn’t match my expertise at sounding smooth on the radios, a skill that had been honed sharply with years in fighter squadrons where the slightest radio miscue was grounds for beheading. He understood that and allowed me that luxury. Just to get a sense of what Walt had to contend with, I pulled the radio toggle switches and monitored the frequencies along with him. The predominant radio chatter was from Los Angeles Center, far below us, controlling daily traffic in their sector. While they had us on their scope (albeit briefly), we were in uncontrolled airspace and normally would not talk to them unless we needed to descend into their airspace. We listened as the shaky voice of a lone Cessna pilot asked Center for a readout of his ground speed. Center replied: “November Charlie 175, I’m showing you at ninety knots on the ground.” Now the thing to understand about Center controllers, was that whether they were talking to a rookie pilot in a Cessna, or to Air Force One, they always spoke in the exact same, calm, deep, professional, tone that made one feel important. I referred to it as the ” Houston Center voice.” I have always felt that after years of seeing documentaries on this country’s space program and listening to the calm and distinct voice of the Houston controllers, that all other controllers since then wanted to sound like that, and that they basically did. And it didn’t matter what sector of the country we would be flying in, it always seemed like the same guy was talking. Over the years that tone of voice had become somewhat of a comforting sound to pilots everywhere. Conversely, over the years, pilots always wanted to ensure that, when transmitting, they sounded like Chuck Yeager, or at least like John Wayne. Better to die than sound bad on the radios. Just moments after the Cessna’s inquiry, a Twin Beech piped up on frequency, in a rather superior tone, asking for his ground speed. “I have you at one hundred and twenty-five knots of ground speed.” Boy, I thought, the Beechcraft really must think he is dazzling his Cessna brethren. Then out of the blue, a navy F-18 pilot out of NAS Lemoore came up on frequency. You knew right away it was a Navy jock because he sounded very cool on the radios. “Center, Dusty 52 ground speed check”. Before Center could reply, I’m thinking to myself, hey, Dusty 52 has a ground speed indicator in that million-dollar cockpit, so why is he asking Center for a readout? Then I got it, ol’ Dusty here is making sure that every bug smasher from Mount Whitney to the Mojave knows what true speed is. He’s the fastest dude in the valley today, and he just wants everyone to know how much fun he is having in his new Hornet. And the reply, always with that same, calm, voice, with more distinct alliteration than emotion: “Dusty 52, Center, we have you at 620 on the ground.” And I thought to myself, is this a ripe situation, or what? As my hand instinctively reached for the mic button, I had to remind myself that Walt was in control of the radios. Still, I thought, it must be done – in mere seconds we’ll be out of the sector and the opportunity will be lost. That Hornet must die, and die now. I thought about all of our Sim training and how important it was that we developed well as a crew and knew that to jump in on the radios now would destroy the integrity of all that we had worked toward becoming. I was torn. Somewhere, 13 miles above Arizona, there was a pilot screaming inside his space helmet. Then, I heard it. The click of the mic button from the back seat. That was the very moment that I knew Walter and I had become a crew. Very professionally, and with no emotion, Walter spoke: “Los Angeles Center, Aspen 20, can you give us a ground speed check?” There was no hesitation, and the replay came as if was an everyday request. “Aspen 20, I show you at one thousand eight hundred and forty-two knots, across the ground.” I think it was the forty-two knots that I liked the best, so accurate and proud was Center to deliver that information without hesitation, and you just knew he was smiling. But the precise point at which I knew that Walt and I were going to be really good friends for a long time was when he keyed the mic once again to say, in his most fighter-pilot-like voice: “Ah, Center, much thanks, we’re showing closer to nineteen hundred on the money.” For a moment Walter was a god. And we finally heard a little crack in the armor of the Houston Center voice, when L.A.came back with, “Roger that Aspen, Your equipment is probably more accurate than ours. You boys have a good one.” It all had lasted for just moments, but in that short, memorable sprint across the southwest, the Navy had been flamed, all mortal airplanes on freq were forced to bow before the King of Speed, and more importantly, Walter and I had crossed the threshold of being a crew. A fine day’s work. We never heard another transmission on that frequency all the way to the coast. For just one day, it truly was fun being the fastest guys out there.
Fuckin wheee.
Just railgun the Europeans across the country
Speed doesn’t hurt. Acceleration does. As long as it’s made to accelerate reasonably slowly to reach that speed, you’ll be fine.
All things serve the beam.
Blaine is a pain, and that is the truth
Their low-soeed can’t even stay on the rails. I think it may be some time before the once masters of rail enter the current century.
I looked at taking a train from Albuquerque to Denver for a concert, the trip takes 2-3 days and goes from Albuquerque toto Chicago to Denver and one way cost more than a round trip flight. For reference, it is a 7ish hour drive.
Their long hauls are definitely more vacation based, where the ride is part of the journey - and if you’re not into that then I get how you feel. Amtrak has been doing a great job at refocusing on corridors. The east coast obviously, then they’re working hard on a few key ones like:
- Minneapolis to Chicago
- Portland-Seattle-Vancouver
- California corridor
- Eventually, here’s hoping, the Frontrange: Pueblo-Colorado Springs-Denver-Fort Collins-Cheyenne.
Those are all shorter trips that don’t make much sense to fly with how short it is, and with a few daily trips makes traveling between those cities much easier. Personally those are much better usages of Amtrak’s time. I’ve taken the Portland-Seattle-Vancouver one multiple times and it’s so much nicer than driving - but it’s max 4 hours.
I wish they’d upgrade their long haul routes to go faster. There’s one from SLC to SF I’m interested in, but it takes 18 hours, vs 11 by car or 2 by plane. If it was faster than driving, I’d consider it to avoid the airport.
I don’t blame them for focusing on the easier trips though.
Same, but with the limited funding I get why. Shorter trips like that make money, long hauls don’t - and since they don’t own the tracks they can’t even upgrade them or begin to do anything. I will say 18 is a lot (especially in a coach seat), but there is a positive of not having to drive. I usually take my steam deck and just zone out. Overnights though are tough in coach, for that you really have to want to be there.
Yeah, if I want to go anywhere interesting, it would be an overnight trip, with kids. A sleeping room is way too expensive, so it’s a nonstarter. If it was 3x the speed, it would probably be fine, especially if they left in the morning instead of the evening.
So yeah, the only train I take is the commuter, and only to go to the airport because there’s no connection from the train to my work (there’s a way to get there, but the trip would take 2 hours each way). The commuter can’t go very fast because it has to stop every 5-10 miles, but it’s fine since it goes about as fast as a car.
So yeah, here’s hoping Amtrak can make enough on the east coast to be able to upgrade the west coast.
Their long hauls are definitely more vacation based, where the ride is part of the journey
I get that, but I was looking for an alternative to driving 14 hours round trip. Even if the trip took 7 hours each way, I am not driving it. But to go from 7 hours to 45 hours is insane. For a show on the 5th of November in Denver I have to leave Albuquerque on the 3rd, then leave Denver on the 6th to get back home on the 8th. $171 for the cheap seats each way.
I live near SLC and go get to San Francisco is about 18 hours, and that’s a straight shot. Coach costs about $120, each way, which is about the same price as a non-budget airline. There’s only one train each day and it runs from midnight to about 6PM the next day.
By car it’s about 11 hours and about 2 hours by airplane.
So it’s:
- slower
- not cheaper, perhaps more expensive if you don’t mind budget flights
- less flexible - one train/day in most cases
There are tons of places I just can’t get to, like Las Vegas.
If I was retired or something when spending more time was totally fine, I’d consider taking the train. But as it stands, it’s just not a practical option unless the train is the destination.
are you in the same school as this picard maneuver guy?
A 2 hour drive in Miami will get you to…north Miami
And 50$ in tolls lol
In America, 100 years is a long time
In Europe, 100 miles is a long distanceTf is a mile, bruv? Don’t come in 'ere with these nonsensical made up freedom units
Miles originated in Britain, so talk to them about their made-up nonsense.
At least they were eventually willing to give up the imperial system. I still don’t understand why Americans never got on board with metric; it’s so much easier.
Just watched a video which explains a few things.
Time zones start in UK because of some decent reasoning. France was also a contender for where timezones start for the same kinds of reasoning but conceded it in agreement that UK adopts the new metric system they created
deleted by creator
Yeah, 'Muricans be like “B-but… the Brits…”
Like, yeah. They moved on. They evolved, changed their ways. USians hanging on to legacy units
If I remember my conversions right then a mile is 5280 kilometers. I hope that helps explain why Europeans would fear such a distance!
Tf. Why would anyone have a unit for that
“A benpu is 327 meters!”
…wait a minute… am I being made a fool of? Can’t tell, cuz I don’t comprehend dumb units. I’d legit buy that as a real thing, given how stupid those tend to be
A US customary mile is 5280 US customary feet. 1 US customary foot is 12 US customary inches. 1 US customary inch is 25.4mm. So a US customary mile is 1609344mm, exactly. It derives from the roman “mille passus”, literally 1000 paces, where a pace is the distance between two impacts of the left (or right) foot of a Roman soldier on the march. Quite a few other cultures used a “mile” of some sort even after the fall of Rome, for example the old British imperial mile was 1760 British imperial yards, one British imperial yard predated the definition of the meter but was most precisely measured to be 0.914398415m, so the British imperial mile was 1609341.21mm. Other culture’s miles varied even more than this.