• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      “Destroying Israel is okay, but ethnic cleansing is bad”

      “WOW you think just because we don’t LOVE Israel we’re antisemitic”

      Yes, you broke the code. /s

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          No, what does that have to do with this?

          Is calling for genocide okay up until the moment it happens?

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Ah I see we have several new (well, new to this convo anyway) hasbara techniques employed here.

            We have the classic crybullying

            desperately pretending to be the victim here, of an obvious upcoming genocide of Israel! today! oh my!!

            an attempt at distracting from an indefensible point you just made and cant think of a way to defend

            and leveraging of the holocaust as a tool to push zionist colonialism and murder.

            You have no one here fooled. And no, we are not going to change the subject to whatever fantasy you’d prefer. You dont get to control what we talk about when you get caught lying. You conflated zionism with all jews. No one did that but you. Its wrong and its ghoulish. Zionism doesnt represent all jews and if you had even a shred of integrity you’d take your post down.-

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Ah I see we have several new (well, new to this convo anyway, right) hasbara techniques employed here. We have the classic crybullying, desperately pretending to be the victim, an attempt at distracting from an indefensible point you just made and cant think of a way to defend, and leveraging of the holocaust as a tool to push zionist colonialism and murder.

              What

              … this has no connection to this conversation. Or reality, for that matter.

              You have fun talking to yourself, buddy.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This thread is going so “it’s bad to call for the genocide of israel” i had to re-read the meme.
    It says “expell israelis to europe”… it doesn’t say “kill’em all”, wtf is wrong with this thread? Or am i missing something?

    And no, a one state solution is not possible, as shown after over 70 years. Unless that state was to be ruled and controlled by the UN and all other military forces completely dismantled - so, not gonna happen.
    It would be slightly less unrealistic if the UN was to enforce the Green Line, ensuring the West Bank and Gaza are entirely in control of Palestinians.

    Both fail 'cos the UN has no teeth.

    Full embargo on israel, especially on weapons, could work, but, again, hypocrites of this world won’t let it happen.

  • DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I have never, ever heard of someone calling for the deportation of Israelis. I think anyone who wants that was probably anti-semitic already and has taken the objectively horrific actions of the IDF as a reason to hate Jewish people in general.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I have never, ever heard of someone calling for the deportation of Israelis.

      Calling for their in-place deaths is not a lot better. You have heard that one several times, right?

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This is the innate issue with creating an ethno-state, it makes it difficult to delineate grievances between ethnicity and state. I don’t know what the solution is, but I find it understandable that some people would agree with expulsion.

      Is it really ethnic cleansing when the ethno-state they built continues to genocide their neighbors with the approval of the vast majority of its citizens?

      By that logic that birth in Israel gives the right to stay there, this would in turn mean that this birth revokes the right to compensation for the ancestors that were murdered in the Holocaust or survived it and chose not to go back to Germany.

      I don’t think anyone should have to be kicked out of the place they were born. How do you feel about german babies born in poland during ww2? Or YTs holding all the land in south africa?

      If you read the first comment I made I said it wasn’t my belief but I understand why Palestinians would want Israelis to migrate back to Europe… However, I recognize that it’s not my people who are suffering from apartheid and genocide, and that those people have their own autonomy and will seek their own retribution.

      Israelis chanting death to entire ethnicities but nooooo we can’t say anything that might hurt their poor lil feelings. Bunch of bollocks.

      Should European-Americans all “just relocate” since we occupied North America from the Native Americans?

      Otherwise I don’t see how you’re any different than the Israelites.

      Well one happened in living memory and people are still living in the houses of displaced people in Palestine.

      Zionism is similarly a genocidal fascist ideology. If these colonizers can’t handle freedom, democracy, equality, etc., then they should definitely return to their actual homes.

      Idk, any Israeli citizen currently living there (that wasn’t born there) is a first generation colonizer, surely it’s not anti-semetic to call for that specific subgroup’s relocation, no?

      The “GO BACK TO EUROPE, THE LAND OF YOUR ANCESTORS”, “Israelis are committing ethnic cleansing by their existence”, and “Genocide is Okay, Actually, if it’s in response to another genocide” are widespread in this very fucking thread.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I understand why Palestinians would want Israelis to migrate back to Europe

          Antiyanks still can’t read or use a computer competently, news at 11.

      • smol_beans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You realize that you put the comments in your own post right? So we can read them, then read your summarization of them, and realize how stupid you are.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              If I said “It’s not my belief, but I understand why Israelis think all Palestinians should be killed or expelled. Israelis have their own autonomy, and deserve to make their own decisions on the matter”, would you:

              A. Call it genocidal

              B. Call it genocide apologism

              C. Call it asspatting genocidal sentiment

              D. Think it’s a completely normal and wholesome sentiment to express

              ?

              If your answer is anything except D, take a fucking step back and ask yourself why you find genocide support okay for Bad Ethnicity™ but not for Good Ethnicity™.

              If your answer is D, go home and rethink your whole fucking life.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  “We don’t want them killed, we’re just going to kill them if they don’t leave, it’s totally not genocide” is literally why the term ethnic cleansing came about and why it’s regarded as genocidal, for fuck’s sake.

                  Any other “We just really want them to leave” genocides you’d like to bootlick for? Maybe the Armenian genocide, or the genocides during the Yugoslav Wars? Or maybe the early stages of the Nazi genocide, when expelling the Jews was the main plan? Hell, maybe you’d like to swap sides on the ongoing Palestinian genocide? After all, the Israelis ‘only’ want the Palestinians out of Palestine!

  • vivalapivo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    There’s no undo button here. You can’t ungenocide by genocide, you can’t ungay a gay and you can’t unvote Trump. We can move only forward

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      So I, a jew who has never even been to Israel, who’s ancestors left centuries ago, am responsible for the state of Israel in any fucking way?

      Jewish does not mean Israeli… At all.

      • febra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        So I, as a jew, who has never even been to Israel, don’t feel threatened by the original comment at all, because I’m not an Israeli settler and haven’t kicked anyone off their property, and thus don’t have to fear having to give anyone their stolen property back.

      • MetalMachine@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Ummm I never said that.

        I agree that Jewish does not mean Israeli.

        I’m specifically talking about individuals involved in war crimes that they should be held accountable.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Anti semitic remarks are not the same as anti Israeli remarks

          I feel nothing when that guy changed “death, death to the IDF”. Well, maybe a mix of amusement and concern. But I have nothing, at all, to do with the IDF and do not support what they do

          When you say, in this context, “I’ll cool it with the anti semitic comments when war criminals are brought to justice”, how do you think that feels?

          Don’t take this shit casually, anti semitism goes back to biblical times. I’ve experienced it growing up. And now, they’re asking new York Jews what they think of “their” prime minister? They’re “othering” us already

          They just built a concentration camp. In America. The Holocaust wasn’t the first time they targeted the Jews as the enemy within. I’ve always reminded my family who start flirting with conservatism… We’re always second. When they run out of people that look different, we’re next

          I know what you meant. But that’s not what you said, and words matter

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m onboard with that, man. Like I said, I’m down with everything up to the very destruction of the Israeli state. It’s just ethnic cleansing and antisemitism I’m opposed to.

      • febra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Why not destroy the state and create one where everyone has equal rights? A state anchored in the supremacy of one group is an apartheid state. It’s clear as day which side you’re on supporting such a state.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Why not destroy the state and create one where everyone has equal rights?

          That’s literally what a one-state solution is, as supported in the very fucking title. Jesus Christ.

          A state anchored in the supremacy of one group is an apartheid state. It’s clear as day which side you’re on supporting such a state.

          Me: “Like I said, I’m down with everything up to the very destruction of the Israeli state.”

          You: “It’s clear that you support the state of Israel!”

          The worst part is, I don’t know if this is trolling. I legitimately believe that you could be at this reading level.

          • febra@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            There will be no Israeli state in a world where everyone has equal rights. It will be destroyed if it is for everyone to have equal rights. And a new state will be founded, under a name that is not Israel and doesn’t resemble the apartheid state of Israel. Only then can you actually talk about equal rights for every group of people.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              … okay? How does that contradict anything I said, considering that I explicitly mentioned the destruction of the Israeli state as perfectly fine by me?

              Or are you going to ignore that and make another inane statement in direct contradiction to the very comment you’re quoting?

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Imagine if nature does what humankind could not - ends the whole miserable crisis.

  • confluence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Israel is the most anti-Jewish state since Nazi Germany, and Palestinians are semitic.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I mean sure. Don’t me a racist bigot. Of course.

    But let’s not pretend that religion isn’t fueling the atrocities being committed on both sides of the conflict.

    • PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Jews, Muslims, and Christians lived in that area together for hundreds of years. This is a political conflict. The fucking Israeli settlers are psychopaths who roll into towns and start setting things on fire. It’s about territory, like all colonialist aggression.

      Just gonna leave this here…

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Religion does have a nonzero influence, but you’re correct in that this is primarily a political conflict. Zionists murder Muslim and Christian Palestinians alike, and Fatah, a secular resistance movement, was the leading org of the Palestinian side for the longest time.

        • PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Okay, so by “Zionists” are you referring exclusively to members of the Israeli government or might there perhaps be a broader ideology at play here? The meme reeks of a Bernie Sanders-esqe “Netanyahu is the problem” kind of narrative.

          I don’t care where they go, just leave the fucking indigenous people alone.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Okay, so by “Zionists” are you referring exclusively to members of the Israeli government or might there perhaps be a broader ideology at play here?

            There’s a broader ideology at play here that is very deeply engrained in Israeli society.

            The meme reeks of a Bernie Sanders-esqe “Netanyahu is the problem” kind of narrative.

            Sanders is a politician, not a polisci professor. Politicians say what they think will get them closer to the solutions they think they can achieve, not necessarily what is objectively correct. “We need to get rid of the worst of the genociders who has sparked the current wave of genocide, and condemning 70% of Israeli society, however correctly, will not give us the allies we need to reduce the current stage of the genocide and move to the next step of a just and lasting peace” kind of thinking - Sanders has long been a radical, by US standards, voice in support of the Palestinian cause. Thinking that him focusing on the most immediate enemy is condemnation worthy is blinkered at best.

            I don’t care where they go, just leave the fucking indigenous people alone.

            … do you care if Israelis in Israeli-majority areas recognized by international law as part of the state of Israel remain in Israel, where many of them were born and raised?

    • Shayeta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Religion isn’t fueling it, it is just used as moral justification from both sides. If religion didn’t exist the same thing would happen, but with a different form of moral justification.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think you’re wrong about religion. You’re trying to say that religion is used as justification afterwards, but we know that real numbers of religious nuts will endorse horrible things because of their religious beliefs.

        In other words, would there be less violence occurring in that region if nobody had any religious beliefs? I think the answer has to be “probably yes”. We know this by talking to people, by looking at religious zealots throughout history. But even if our logic is correct, we cannot accurately guess how much less violence would be occurring if the region were full of atheists.

        And in some sense our counterfactual thought experiment doesn’t even matter because the reality is that region is of great religious significance and you can’t really write that off as being irrelevant when several millennia prove that it is.

        • mechoman444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Also statistically countries with larger populations of atheists are significantly less violent.

          Of course correlation doesn’t equal causation and it could be other environmental factors contributing to that nonviolence but nevertheless…

    • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s a ton of racism too. Darker skinned Jews get all sorts of discrimination, it’s just not as extreme as someone who is Palestinian.

    • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This is what I said and then someone blew up in my face about it when I said this in another thread/post. Why are people so hard headed when it comes to accepting reality I wonder.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If it wasn’t religion it would be race or ideology or language or eye color. You could press a button and eliminate religion from history and all of these problems would still exist.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Unfortunately, the term “antisemitic” no longer has any kind of fixed meaning. I wish that weren’t true, and I think it’s a combination of forces that decided to misuse the word for several decades, that have now led to it being meaningless.

    And you might be tempted to tell me what you think it means, and maybe I could agree with you, but when I turn on the TV tomorrow someone else will be using it in a totally different way that’s inconsistent. Actually I’m kidding. I don’t have a TV.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Words that people misuse are still meaningful when the reader and writer both understand the same meaning. I expect you understand OP perfectly well.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Words that people misuse for the sake of propaganda are intentionally misleading, regardless of how any in-group understands it.

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Your use of the word “intentionally” is quite confusing to me. Intentionally misleading on whose part? The word’s part, or the in-group’s?

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Jewish people and groups around the world need to issue strong rejection of Israel’s actions.

    If they don’t, i’m very concerned that Israel’s crimes will fall back on them in the future.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Let’s look at sentiment from different groups

      Young and liberal associate them with Israeli genocide.

      Young and conservative is full of full on Nazis.

      Politically they aren’t worth much being concentrated in liberal strongholds.

      When the old folks who are pro Israel go into the grounds dislike will be a rare point of agreement. Not a great position.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It will protect them from the free palestine crowd, but not from anti-semites. Is there a downside though?

          • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I’m sure contains, though I doubt there’s a complete overlap, not covers for. People who want a literal genocide to end aren’t automatically antisemites or antisemite apologists. Nor are antisemites, especially Trumper antisemites, automatically in favor of Palestine.

          • jsomae@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Well yeah, obviously. There are anti-semites everywhere. I meant those whose motivations are “free palestine,” which in my estimate is the main motivation of the free palestine crowd when viewed as a whole – not antisemitism. I don’t mean to say that there don’t exist people who are aligned with free-palestine just because they’re anti-semitic. But there’s no protection from those people either way – so, no downside.