Welp…

    • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bro as a lefty I’m so scared of this America Party bro. Like we really won’t be able to beat them frfr. If republicans have the Trump Party and the America Party it’ll be like they’re twice as strong. They definitely won’t just start taking sides and splitting the vote so that their already fake “majority” completely falls apart. And the muskrat definitely wouldn’t be dumb enough to try to rig an election so his puppet candidate beats a Trump Party candidate prompting Dump or SCOTUS to crack down on election rigging. That would never in a million years happen bc the America Party is gonna totally be the people’s party bro

      /s just in case

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s Musk so he’ll probably rebrand them as NaXis.

      Maybe enough MAGAts will join him that it will split the vote and it will get easier to get people with basic human decency elected. That is assuming we continue to have elections.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      The only good thing of that is that the otherwise shitty FPTP system will make him and Trump go for each others throat.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I just want to remind anyone thinking that this is a good thing because it will siphon off voters from the Republican Party - Elon Musk is only doing this because Trump cut the EV mandate from the Big Bullshit Bill and didn’t appoint his guy to NASA. No matter what he says about spending or debt ceilings, he doesn’t care about any of it and was in the loop the entire time that legislation was being crafted. He’s still only in this for himself, just as he was when he gleefully threw a Nazi salute on stage thinking he just got everything he could ever want when he bought the president his office.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure, that’s fine, I just don’t want people to lose sight of the bigger picture here. Musk is not an altruist. He’s not the good guy all of a sudden. He didn’t grow a conscience after falling out with Trump.

        If this political party ever gets off the ground, which it probably won’t, Musk will always have a controlling interest in it. He will never ever let the party move away from enabling and enacting his agenda, and his alone. He doesn’t give a single shit or a wipe about helping Americans. He wants to protect his fortune by taking control of the government apparatus to end regulations or investigations that impede the companies he is in charge of. That’s it.

        I certainly hope that Democrats will see this for the nakedly transparent political maneuver that it is, and not get swept up in the idea of a 3rd party founded and controlled by a billionaire will bring any kind of meaningful change to the system. And I believe they will - we rejected Bloomberg and Steyer in 2020 because they were out-of-touch billionaires who tried to buy their way into the party, and I think that Democrats are not so easily fooled by the obvious bad faith rich cunts who try to buy their way into the public zeitgeist. I just worry that people will see this move by Musk as “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” and shift closer to his values as a result. He might be the enemy of your enemy, but he’s still an an enemy as far as I’m concerned.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          This isn’t what anyone is celebrating.

          They don’t think for a second that Musk will do anything positive.

          What they’re hoping for is republicans to split somewhere near the middle, some in support of MAGAts and some in support of Musk, which could lead to more people voting for a democrat than a republican. Votes that would have gone toward a MAGAt will go to Musk. That is the prayer.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Nobody who actually cares about others thinks Musk is the good guy. This is strictly an evil vs. evil situation.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      As much as I fucking hate Musk, he does understand two things:

      1. EVs will never be the mainstream without federal and state project support
      2. Funneling money from the government to billionaires is the worst thing for an economy

      What I find fucking mind-blowing is that this idiot is selling a shoddy EV and solar product at premium costs to other idiots, but very much aligned with Democrats on the two points above. Not only did he back the wrong horse, he straight up accidentally got on the wrong horse, and rode it threw towns away from where he was living very comfortably.

      Now this fucking moron needs to invent new ways to make Tesla appealing to the “normies” because nobody is buying his bullshit stalling tactics or premium pricing for sub-par products.

      I’ve got my popcorn ready, but the siphoning of votes away from Trump is just the butter on top.

      • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I dont see how you can draw that conclusion for item 2. He claims to care about the deficit, not funelling money to billionaires. Belive me, he would have you living under a bridge eating gruel before he would touch anything that affects his wealth.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not sure I agree with point #2 - I’d be willing to bet he would love to funnel some of that sweet tax money into his own pocket, but he doesn’t want it in the form of tax breaks for income earners, he wants it in the form of EV subsidies for Tesla, which Trump denied him by cutting the EV tax incentive from the spending bill. I don’t think he even acknowledges that tax breaks for billionaires are bad for the economy, just that the big bullshit bill is bad for him specifically.

        On everything else, though, I agree wholeheartedly. His brand is toxic now, and without being able to sell a sub-par product at dirt-cheap prices, he’s going to get a heavy dose of reality when consumers reject his rolling coffins in favor of cheaper alternatives.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          If course you don’t. That’s why you side with Trump. The fact that “trickle down economics” has been disproven time and time again means nothing to you folks.

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Huh? Did you reply to the wrong person? Because I don’t side with Trump. Check my comment history.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago
        1. EVs will never be the mainstream without federal and state project support

        in not sure about that… imo EVs would be relatively comparable if ICE vehicles and oil didn’t have massive subsidies at every stage from governments… more if negative externalities were properly accounted for

        or maybe not: in australia we have a fuel excise and EV credit and they’re still pretty expensive relative to ICE

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think total cost of ownership is lower for EVs for people that have reasonable electricity rates and can charge at home, but that’s a tougher sell and most people aren’t even sure that it will work out unless they try it.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          EV’s only become popular when cheaper. It’s a fact.

          Not everyone lives in areas where solar installs at ean option. The offset doesn’t make sense when you go north or south of the globe where the sun don’t shine.

  • Waldschrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Now do another 10 or 20 parties more and maybe america could finally become a democratic country.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I hope this becomes big enough to split the right-wing vote. I wish him all the success possible.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Doesn’t seem terribly likely to me for Musk to concede before the election. There’s still something to gain from it being public knowledge how many voted for you last election. This did happen recently in BC, Canada though, where the established conservatives bowed out at the last minute to give votes to the new far-right party.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “America Party”

    Americans really are the ultimate parody of themselves. Have fun with your civil war.

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not just the USA or even just North America. It’s apparently a party for South America as well!

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        A bunch of Nazis escaped to South American countries after WW2. I’m sure they low key raised more baby Nazis.

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hopefully it has success at breaking us from our failed two party system, while at the same time the party itself fails (and costs him lot of money in the process).

      • ExFed@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        We’ll need ranked choice (or some other voting scheme other than First Past The Post). Otherwise it’ll just end up the same as it always has.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Need new rules in House and Senate, too. The majority party gets majority in all the committees, gets to pick all the committee chairs, etc. All of the current non-D/non-R members ‘caucus’ with one of the major parties, making them de facto members of that party. A third party with enough representation to block the other two from gaining majority would almost certainly end up in an alliance with one, leaving us back with functional two-party politics.

        • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ll gladly accept a reactionary centrist spoiler party into the mix. Especially if it coincides with the Clinton wing of the DNC losing its ability to maintain its grip on power.

    • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Best case scenario is it will split the right wing vote. In Canada, we’re used to it going the other way with conservatives taking advantage of a split left.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah…

      At best, it splits the MAGAt vote, making Dems a clear winner.

      At worst, it takes some GenZ dipshit votes away from Dems and causes chaos.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    How many weeks before he gets bored and abandons it when things don’t immediately work, just like everything else in his useless life?

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      unlike rockets or cars, political party success in America is measured in dollars

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ll just point out the risk of what I’ll call “Joe Roganing” here. Elon pretends he hates both parties while there’s no election coming up. Then when the election arrives he “makes up his mind” and endorses Republicans. This allows him to 1) attract people fed up with both parties just to hand them to Republicans, and 2) have a credible that that forces Republicans to do his bidding.

    • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, this seems like it may actually be some good news in this endless sea of shit we’ve been in. But the chances of it actually going anywhere are pretty slim.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Liberals hate musk and won’t vote for his party. Split the stupid vote and watch Dems win unwinnable races. If he pulls that off for 2 election cycles you might even see Republicans go in on ranked choice voting.