• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    We’ve gotten so good at faking most lighting effects that honestly RTX isn’t a huge win except in certain types of scenes.

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      The difference is pretty big when there are lots of reflective surfaces, and especially when light sources move (prebaked shadows rarely do, and even when, it’s hardly realistic).

      A big thing is that developers use less effort and the end result looks better. That’s progress. You could argue it’s kind of like when web developers finally were able to stop supporting IE9 - it wasn’t big for end users, but holy hell did the job get more enjoyable, faster and also cheaper.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        Cyberpunk and Control are both great examples - both games are full of reflective surfaces and it shows. Getting a glimpse of my own reflection in a dark office is awesome, as is tracking enemy positions from cover using such reflections.

    • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      But, it takes a lot of work by designers to get the fake lighting to look natural. Raytracing would help avoid that toil if the game is forced RT.