• inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    He also said that “purity tests” within the party have led to more division in the US.

    What he’s saying is he wants more Conservatives in the Democratic party.

    F this guy and his failure of Democratic leadership.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    He’s not the worst, but he’s definitely part of the problem. When he calls for new leadership, he really means give it to him, and he wouldn’t be much better than Schmuckie Boy. He’d be just as Zionist, that’s for sure.

    If Booker becomes president, MAGA will be back in power 4 years later.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Let me guess, he should be leader? Even though he’s part of the leadership that failed the moment?

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ll stare directly at the sun, but never in the mirror

      It must be exhausting always rooting for the anti-hero

  • shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you smelt it you dealt it. Get out and make room for someone who actually gives a fuck

  • RosaLuxemburgsGhost@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    There is no leadership that can make a system designed from the ground up to screw workers and minorities in order to enrich billionaires work in the interests of workers and minorities. You can’t reform rot.

    • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      So on one hand people here hate the Democrat leadership (with good reason). But now when this guy is speaking out against the Democrat leadership, you criticize them for internal division?

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        He wants to maintain the current right-wing leadership, not to put someone in charge who’d actually do anything differently. Replacing Schumer with another corporate stooge is a guaranteed way to continue losing elections and capitulating to MAGA.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        You have to actually listen and pay attention to more than the most absolute surface level stuff. He wants people who are worse.

        The enemy of your enemy is not your friend if they’re just looking for a power grab. In fact, they could very likely be a lot worse.

        • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Possibly - but the people here complaining were not very articulate about it…

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        He’s part of that leadership. He’s part of the problem. We want real change for working people, he just wants to change who’s getting the corporate bribes.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    “We need new democratic leaders who are centrists unlike Hillary ‘third way’ Clinton, Joe ‘tough on crime’ Biden, and Kamala ‘the cop’ Harris.”

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    In concept, he’s right.

    Democrats have spent far far far too much energy focusing on controversial wedge issues like gun control and trans issues.

    If they focused on the issues that virtually all Americans can get behind, things like fixing our healthcare, getting corruption out of Washington and other parts of government, holding large corporations to account when they destroy our economy and ruin the environment, and overall making life and upward advancement affordable for average Americans, they would absolutely clean house in every election.

    Instead they spend a ton of effort on things like gun control (which does nothing for their base but only alienates rural moderates and Republicans that might make the switch), and spend a ton of time getting bogged down in debates over stupid shit.

    When that happens if they had a half a brain they would be doing table flip moments like why the fuck are we talking about which bathroom somebody uses when millions of Americans can’t feed their fucking kids? Why are we obsessing over what kind of ID gets you into a voting booth when the middle class is dying? Why are we wasting billions of dollars in Iran when the same money spent here at home would fix healthcare or hunger or education? Are our own citizens not worth the time or expense? And why do we have national policies that encourage a CEO to amass more wealth than all of his hourly employees combined?
    And if any of these things are important to us, why then could the Republicans as a minority grind the government to a halt under Obama, forcing us to negotiate with them, why can’t we do the same? Why aren’t we doing the same?

    Get a bunch of Democrats to say this every time, every camera, every interview, and that they will stand up against their own party when it doesn’t work to fix this, that’s how you win elections.