• anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I had my energy company remove their LVTC smart meter this week after they started using it to shut off our condenser unit during our 100 degree days

    The fact that it exists at all is bad enough, but they were doing this at a time when our AC was already malfunctioning due to low refrigerant. On the day they first shut it off, our house reached 94 degrees.

    The program that the previous owner signed up for that enabled them to do this gave them a fucking two dollar a month discount.

    I use a smart thermostat to optimize my home conditioning - having a second meter fucking with my schedule ends up making us all miserable. Energy providers need to stop fucking around and just build out their infrastructure to handle worst case peak loads, and enable customers to install solar to reduce peak loading to begin with.

    The other thing that kills me about this is that our provider administers our city’s solar electric subsidy program themselves. When i had them come out to give us a quote, they inflated their price by more than 100% because they knew what our electricity bill was. All they did was take our average monthly bill and multiplied it by the repayment period. I could have been providing them more energy to the grid at their peak load if they hadn’t tried scamming me.

    FUCK private energy providers.

    • Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      How tf can a meter shut of an applience? Did you also have smart breakers from them?

      Anyway absolutely ridiculous

      • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s separate from the main meter and connected directly at the condenser unit.

        It monitors power draw and acts as a relay when the provider sends a shutoff signal. The thermostat thinks the system is still going, and the fans still push air through the vents, but the coils aren’t being cooled anymore so the air gets hot and musty.

    • illusionist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Peak load of households is not during peak solar power generation. Households installing pv isn’t a solution to what you described.

      Today, you could also use a battery to buy power during mid day and use it in the evening when you need it the most.

      • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        In moderate climates in the US, peak loads are typically the hottest and sunniest hours of the day since condenser units are the most energy-hungry appliance in most homes. Clouds notwithstanding, peak solar generation would typically align (or closely align) with peak load time.

        Batteries would also help a lot - they should definitely be subsidizing the installation of those as well but unfortunately they aren’t yet (at least not in my state).

        • illusionist@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Why do you want a subsidy for batteries? Installing batteries at a large scale at homes is incredibly expensive compared to an off site battery. Especially with regards to the move towards hydrogen.

          • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            For the same reason we want to subsidize solar production in residential construction even though it’s more efficient and cost-productive to do it at-scale. Having energy production and storage at the point of use reduces strain on power infrastructure and helps alleviate the types of load surging ayyy is talking about.

            It’s not a replacement for modernizing our power grids, too - it simply helps to make them more resilient.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      our city’s solar electric subsidy program

      It sounds like there’s two different things there. There’s a solar installation (hardware, etc.), and there’s likely some kind of net metering program (where they pay you or give you credit for electricity you generate). That paragraph sounds like the first, but the phrase sounds like the second.

      You shouldn’t have to go through them for the solar installation, if your conditions accommodate it. Granted, the conditions don’t apply to everyone. You’ll want to have a suitable roof that ideally faces south-ish, own your home, and plan to stay there for at least 10 years. In the US, you also kind of need to get it done within this calendar year, which is a rough ask, before the federal 30% tax credit goes away. But maybe you can find an installer that isn’t trying to scam you quite as much.

      (It’s early and cloudy today.)

      Solar system stats, Home Assistant panel

      • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Sorry, maybe I wasn’t being clear.

        My area has solar incentive programs that are run through the energy utility - meaning the state makes available zero-interest loans for the purposes of solar installation, but those loans are only available through an entity partnered with our utility. They limit the number of homes in each area that are eligible through this program so that solar generation never exceeds demand. Our home was eligible through the program, so I had them come out to give us a quote. Our utility is also transitioning to surge pricing and smart metering, so there’s a pretty high demand for solar installation in my area and they know that they’d lose out on a lot of revenue if everyone installed their own solar systems.

        A part of that process was them asking for the last year of energy bills, along with taking measurements and doing daylighting analysis on our roof area. At the end, they gave us a quote for a 15 year loan for the equipment and installation, and it just so happened that the monthly payment was the same as our average energy bill. I work in AEC and I know what solar panels cost, and they had inflated their price by more than double what it would cost at market rate.

        Of course I could install my own panels, but it would be out-of-pocket and I would have to seek out and apply for out-of-state incentive programs myself, but I can’t afford the up-front costs and the loan terms don’t make sense for how long we’ll be in this house. Id love nothing more than to do it myself, even at a loss if that’s what it took, but I have a spouse that is less spiteful than I am.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          more than double what it would cost at market rate

          I definitely paid more for labor than for materials. My payoff time is about 13 years with a Tesla Powerwall 3, maybe a bit less now that I have an EV. I had a team of 4 guys plus an electrician here for about five days.

          I did go with a slightly more reputable company that charged slightly more, but I would have gone elsewhere if it was a huge difference.

          Maybe I should get around to making a post in !Solarpunk@slrpnk.net or something, even though it isn’t very punk.

          • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            I’m factoring in labor. It was an extremely bad deal - they were praying on the fact most home owners do not have familiarity with solar installation pricing.

            Like I said, I would love to still do it on my own, but it just doesn’t make sense for our household.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    When I’m told there’s power issues and to conserve power I drop my AC to 60 and leave all my lights on. Only way for them to fix the grid is to break it.

  • johnyreeferseed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Meanwhile I’m down town I’m my city cleaning windows in office buildings that are 75% empty but the heat or ac is blasting on completely empty floors and most of the lights are on.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Worse is Google that insists on shoving a terrible AI-based result in your face every time you do a search, with no way to turn it off.

    I’m not telling these systems to generate images of cow-like girls, but I’m getting AI shoved in my face all the time whether I want it or not. (I don’t).

    • jjmoldy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I am trying to understand what Google’s motivation for this even is. Surely it is not profitable to be replacing their existing, highly lucrative product with an inferior alternative that eats up way more power?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Their motivation is always ads. The ai response is longer and takes time to read so more time looking at their ads. If the answer is sufficient, you might not even click away to the search result.

        AI is a potential huge bonanza to search sites, letting them suck up the ad revenue that used to goto the search results

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Yeah, that thing that nobody wanted? Everybody has to have it. Fuck corporations and capitalism.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Just like screens in cars, and MASSIVE trucks. We don’t want this. Well, some dumbass Americans do, but intelligent people don’t need a 32 ton 6 wheel drive pickup to haul jr to soccer.

      • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Massive trucks? They need those trucks for truck stuff, like this giant dilhole parking with his wife to go to Aldi today. Not even a flag on the end of that ladder, it filled a whole spot by itself.

        My couch wouldn’t fit in that bed, and every giant truck I see is sparkling shiny and looks like it hasn’t done a day of hard labor, much like the drivers.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Do you have any data to support this is actually the case? I see this all the time but absolutely zero evidence but a 2015 Axios survey with no methodology or dataset. Nearly every article cites this one industry group with 3 questions that clearly aren’t exclusive categorical and could be picked apart by a high school student.

        I ask this question nearly every time I see this comment and in 5 years I have not found a single person who can actually cite where this came from or a complete explanation of even hope they got to that conclusion.

        The truck owners I know, myself included, use them all the time for towing and like the added utility having the bed as as secondary feature.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          The truck owners I know, myself included, use them all the time for towing and like the added utility having the bed as as secondary feature.

          Then you put it beside a truck from 30 years ago that’s a quarter the overall size but has the same bed capacity and towing power along with much better visibility instead of not being able to see the child you’re about to run over. And then you understand what people mean when they say massive trucks - giant ridiculously unnecessary things that are all about being a status symbol and dodging regulations rather than practicality.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Let me express it to you with some numbers… The US is ~3.81 million square miles in size.

          The F150 has sold 8.810 million units in the US in the last 10 years.

          There are ~ 2.3 F150s fewer than 10 years old for every square mile in this country.

          There is no way the majority of those trucks are going to job sites, or hauling junk, or pulling a trailer, just look around. That’s not even all trucks. Thats just one model, from one brand, for a single 10 yr period.

          These trucks are primarily sold as a vanity vehicle, and a minivan alternative, and that’s what I think when I see one.

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              No, trump style math would be saying that The number of Trucks Towing has gone DOWN 400% PERCENT after the EVIL AMERICA HATING COMMUNIST Dems elected a soon-to-be-illegal Migrant Gang member as Mayor of New York NYC.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        You underestimate the number of people you wouldn’t class as intelligent. If no one wanted massive trucks, they would have disappeared off the market within a couple of years because they wouldn’t sell. They’re ridiculous, inefficient hulks that basically no one really needs but they sell, so they continue being made.

        • moakley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s actually because small trucks were regulated out of the US market. Smaller vehicles have more stringent mileage standards that trucks aren’t able to meet. That forces companies to make all their trucks bigger, because bigger vehicles are held to a different standard.

          So the people who want or need a truck are pushed to buy a larger one.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Let’s do the math.

    Let’s take an SDXl porn model, with no 4-step speed augmentations, no hand written quantization/optimization schemes like svdquant, or anything, just an early, raw inefficient implementation:

    https://www.baseten.co/blog/40-faster-stable-diffusion-xl-inference-with-nvidia-tensorrt/#sdxl-with-tensorrt-in-production

    So 2.5 seconds on an A100 for a single image. Let’s batch it (because that’s what’s done in production), and run it on the now popular H100 instead, and very conservatively assume 1.5 seconds per single image (though it’s likely much faster).

    That’s on a 700W SXM Nvidia H100. Usually in a server box with 7 others, so let’s say 1000W including its share of the CPU and everything else. Let’s say 1400W for networking, idle time, whatever else is going on.

    That’s 2 kJ, or 0.6 watt hours.

    …Or about the energy of browsing Lemmy for 30-60 seconds. And again, this is an high estimate, but also a fraction of a second of usage for a home AC system.


    …So yeah, booby pictures take very little energy, and the usage is going down dramatically.

    Training light, open models like Deepseek or Qwen or SDXL takes very little energy, as does running them. The GPU farms they use are tiny, and dwarfed by something like an aluminum plant.

    What slurps energy is AI Bros like Musk or Altman trying to brute force their way to a decent model by scaling out instead of increasing efficiency, and mostly they’re blowing that out of proportion to try the hype the market and convince them AI will be expensive and grow infinitely (so people will give them money).

    That isn’t going to work very long. Small on-device models are going to be too cheap to compete.

    https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kc978dg

    So this is shit, they should be turning off AI farms too, but your porn images are a drop in the bucket compared to AC costs.


    TL;DR: There are a bazillion things to flame AI Bros about, but inference for small models (like porn models) is objectively not one of them.

    The problem is billionaires.

    • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t disagree with you but most of the energy that people complain about AI using is used to train the models, not use them. Once they are trained it is fast to get what you need out of it, but making the next version takes a long time.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Only because of brute force over efficient approaches.

        Again, look up Deepseek’s FP8/multi GPU training paper, and some of the code they published. They used a microscopic fraction of what OpenAI or X AI are using.

        And models like SDXL or Flux are not that expensive to train.

        It doesn’t have to be this way, but they can get away with it because being rich covers up internal dysfunction/isolation/whatever. Chinese trainers, and other GPU constrained ones, are forced to be thrifty.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          And I guess they need it to be inefficient and expensive, so that it remains exclusive to them. That’s why they were throwing a tantrum at Deepseek, because they proved it doesn’t have to be.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Bingo.

            Altman et al want to kill open source AI for a monopoly.

            This is what the entire AI research space already knew even before deepseek hit, and why they (largely) think so little of Sam Altman.

            The real battle in the space is not AI vs no AI, but exclusive use by AI Bros vs. open models that bankrupt them. Which is what I keep trying to tell /c/fuck_ai, as the “no AI” stance plays right into the AI Bro’s hands.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    We’re going away folks, and nothing of any true value will be lost, except all the species that did live in homeostasis with the Earth that we’re taking with us in our species’ avarice induced murder-suicide

    • millie@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Carlin had some good material, but this is an absolutely stupid mindset. We can cause an extreme level of ecological damage. Will the planet eventually recover? Quite possibly. But that’s not a certainty, and in the mean time we’re triggering a mass extinction precisely because irresponsible humans figure there’s no way we can hurt the Earth and it’s self-important hubris to think that we can.

      But the time we’re living through and the time we’re heading into are all the proof we should need that it’s actually hubris to assume our actions have no meaningful impact.