• raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    “non-trans” normal person here, and I think everyone who has a problem with trans / queer / whatever people is a fucking moron. I absolutely support the “trans agenda”

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I am fully aware what some people use, but it is a made-up word of the English language and I won’t apply it to myself. I don’t have a problem with people using it, but it’s not my vocabulary. It neither has an inherent sense, nor does it have any added value in most context. I respect that it helps to normalize specifying whatever gender one associates with when “cis” people also do it, as opposed to only having trans / non-binary people to specify “what” they identify as. But my solidarity extends only to full acceptance and tolerance, not to changing how I “identify” myself :p

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            No, that part (cis) is a prefix and means “on this side of”. And for “on this side of gender” to mean what cisgender is used as, is a newly agreed-upon thing in the evolution of LGBTQ culture.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              But when you say things like ‘“non-trans” normal person’ it sounds like you’re saying it isn’t normal to be trans. Why not just say “non-trans” or “cis” instead of saying “normal person”?

                • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Well it certainly contributes to othering the people you don’t view as “normal”. Don’t use cis, whatever, but paired with you saying you specifically know cis is a term and you specifically choose not to use it, calling cis people normal certainly sounds transphobic. You’re following the conservative’s playbook. Don’t say cis people are the “normal” ones.

                  America has a majority of white people living there. Could you imagine if people started calling white people “normal”? The words you choose have consequences.

                  Again, I can’t make this clear enough, this isn’t some bullshit purity test. If you don’t wanna use the term cis to describe yourself, so be it, but don’t use normal. Especially when you’re already willing to use non-trans. Solidarity isn’t othering the persecuted.

  • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    This is where I fall off with liberals. “Lose the Trans talking points, they are holding the DNC back.”

    How about first we try losing the DNC talking points. They’ve been in charge this whole time and I didn’t see trans people allow fascism to wash over the states while they were at the head of the government.

    • CMonster@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      You arent going to win any elections catering to 1% of the total population and alienating a large part of it. I would say that is just common sense politics at this point.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Our current system is predicated upon catering to the wealthiest (0.)1% which keeps winning them elections. Abusers of power get to frame their own opposition, and so you have things like poor people being blamed for the excesses of the rich. So you have people start swearing off avocado toast they never bought in the first place instead of proper italian plumbing.

        Trans-rights have never actually been an issue. Anti-trans people are the issue because they made their issue everyone elses.

        Abusers deflect and redirect onto their targets so they never have to defend themselves. It isn’t that trans people want to survive, it’s that there’s motherfuckers that don’t want trans people to exist.

      • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Protecting the rights of individuals is not catering to 1% of the total population. Its the bare minimum in a supposed civilized democracy. You can never, ever, compromise on protecting individuals that are causing no harm to others and just trying to navigate through the world.

        Do we need to showcase the trans issue? No. We need politicians that are better at navigating the media environment and can effectively strategize against the GOP propaganda machine.

        If you do that first, you wouldn’t have an issue with trans people. For fuck sakes make an attempt at it even and if they are capable and what I say is wrong, fine, expel the trans people from the party. Except, accept you will never be a party of values only one of opposition, so be cautious of ever trying to claim morality after that point.

        • CMonster@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          In this case at this point in time it is. Progressives built their entire hosue of cards on trans and lgbtq rights and then popular opinion swung the other way and the little support they had evaporated in conjunction with their political power.

          • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            If its true their support has waned then the people in power are the exact people who deserve to be. You want to vote for dems because they wear blue not because you give a shit about principles.

            • CMonster@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m so glad your privy to my private thoughts. People like you are why everyone thinks progressives are fucking nutters.