• raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    “non-trans” normal person here, and I think everyone who has a problem with trans / queer / whatever people is a fucking moron. I absolutely support the “trans agenda”

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I am fully aware what some people use, but it is a made-up word of the English language and I won’t apply it to myself. I don’t have a problem with people using it, but it’s not my vocabulary. It neither has an inherent sense, nor does it have any added value in most context. I respect that it helps to normalize specifying whatever gender one associates with when “cis” people also do it, as opposed to only having trans / non-binary people to specify “what” they identify as. But my solidarity extends only to full acceptance and tolerance, not to changing how I “identify” myself :p

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            No, that part (cis) is a prefix and means “on this side of”. And for “on this side of gender” to mean what cisgender is used as, is a newly agreed-upon thing in the evolution of LGBTQ culture.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              But when you say things like ‘“non-trans” normal person’ it sounds like you’re saying it isn’t normal to be trans. Why not just say “non-trans” or “cis” instead of saying “normal person”?

                • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Well it certainly contributes to othering the people you don’t view as “normal”. Don’t use cis, whatever, but paired with you saying you specifically know cis is a term and you specifically choose not to use it, calling cis people normal certainly sounds transphobic. You’re following the conservative’s playbook. Don’t say cis people are the “normal” ones.

                  America has a majority of white people living there. Could you imagine if people started calling white people “normal”? The words you choose have consequences.

                  Again, I can’t make this clear enough, this isn’t some bullshit purity test. If you don’t wanna use the term cis to describe yourself, so be it, but don’t use normal. Especially when you’re already willing to use non-trans. Solidarity isn’t othering the persecuted.