Queer anarchist, avid sci-fi and fantasy fan, and enjoyer of locally run genAI. Always looking forward to learning new things. Death to all governments!
I have direct messages turned off. If you need to contact me privately, you can do so over Matrix.
Please don’t spread misinformation.
it’s not misinformation, you weird little google fanboy.
Also it’s just on certified devices
which is every single major western brand that operates outside of china, and even some that are for that market specifically. you would know that if you had, I don’t know, actually looked at the list of certified devices on google’s own website.
yeah, that’s a whole lot of corporate speak that says absolutely nothing. they wrote two whole paragraphs that promise nothing and don’t back down on their verification plans. and you fell for it, too.
you have no idea what that “advanced flow” means, or what it entails, or even if it will actually be there to begin with, or how long it will be there until they discontinue it.
that’s not backing down at all. they speak of a possible workflow, but they don’t say you’ll be able to install unverified apps. they still say they’ll require it, in fact.
Starting in September 2026, Android will require all apps to be registered by verified developers in order to be installed on certified Android devices
that’s just it, they’re targeting custom ROMs with this too. the number of security updates for AOSP is being cut by Google in order to make custom ROMs less secure, so that they can then close down the project while claiming it’s to protect users. make no mistake, the end goal here is make everyone who uses Android have to do so on their terms.
it’s why Linux phones being mainstream is an absolute priority.
conspiracies are plans made in secret. it’s not a secret that tech companies are trying to gouge people for everything they own, that’s just basic capitalism and every corporation is trying to do that. maybe spend less time being a snarky edgelord on fedi and more time actually using that brain millions of years of evolution gave you.
not what’s meant when they say “the factory must grow”, but let them cook
Why are you coming at them for your dumbass take?
It’s moral and just to murder Nazis.
It’s already too late for Korea, they’ve reached the point where their population is going to collapse. It’s very likely that the country will not exist in its current form a hundred years from now.
if you’re expecting a democrat politician to be anything other than a feckless corporate stooge, then I have some oceanfront property in Colorado to sell you.
That’s nice, because LLMs seem to translate things better than the regular tools, especially when it comes to things like idioms.
Jellyfin supports DV as well, so it isn’t a reason after all.
Does anyone have a working setup
Any Jellyfin setup would do, as long as whatever you’re watching it on supports DV.
oh that’s horrible, huh.
You’re right, that was my bad
Just to clarify, somebody suing another party doesn’t automatically mean that party broke any laws.
Yes, that’s literally what I said. Fan art may not be illegal, but it’s not legal either. The point is moot, however. If a corporation with billions or trillions of dollars can sue you with impunity, while even a meager defense can financially ruin you for life, then there is no practical difference between a legal and illegal act. The fact remains that fighting someone like Disney over something like fanart is beyond the ability of nearly everyone on earth.
Fan art is not illegal.
Off the top of my head, I know both Disney and Nintendo have sued people for making fan art. Fair use doesn’t explicitly allow you to make fan art, regardless of its transformative nature, and whether or not you owe Disney hundreds of thousands of dollars for drawing Mickey depends on court review on a case-by-case basis because it’s not technically legal in the US. It may also not be technically illegal, but that doesn’t mean a corporation can’t sue you and be awarded millions in civil damages if they think you profited off the art in some way.
A quick google search will source you lawyers saying such.
Of course it’s a mustang
Let’s Encrypt is a trusted, established alternative, it could replace Microsoft for long-lived software certificates.
Uh, no it could not.
First of all, the whole point of signing software is to ensure it comes from a reputable source. Let’s Encrypt signs certificates with an automated process that does no verification whatsoever of the identity of the person asking for a certificate. It would make the whole process completely pointless.
Second, Let’s Encrypt has stated themselves over a decade ago that they have no intention of doing this because it would render the whole system pointless.
She only opposes it because the warehouse is next to her business and she doesn’t want people in chains to be within her view. This bitch is still a shitty racist.