If your girlfriend makes a lot more than you, and she pays for your dates, trips, etc., do you feel bad about it or no?

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would feel like it is my responsibility to contribute equally or more. I wouldn’t feel “horrible”, but I, personally, would use it as motivation to start looking for a job that pays more.

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      30 days ago

      Instead of equality, aim for equity. If everything is 50/50 but one person makes double what the other does, the lower earner is paying more than their fair share.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Indeed. Back when we first moved in together, my wife and I split the bills around 80/20. It wasn’t quite lined up with our relative incomes that year, but it was pretty close, and it meant that we both saved more money in our respective budgets than living separately.

        Fast forward (or is it ‘flash forward’ now?) to today, tbh I have no idea what the split is. I cover the mortgage and power, she covers the water bill and has me on her health plan through work. Groceries get paid by the person stopping at the store – again, no idea what the split is.

        I count us fortunate that we’re able to pay the bills without a lot of worry. Inflation has been a beast the past couple of years, but we’re weathering that storm.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        30 days ago

        You can do that if you want. I’m not going to. I would work harder to get a better job so I could contribute my fair share.

          • blarghly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            No… the way that I worked harder to get my last pay raise. By identifying the intersection of my interests and market needs in my workplace, doing a mix of theoretical study and practice in my free time, and applying for other jobs so I would have leverage to negotiate.

            Seriously, some of yall are such doomers. Yes it is possible to get paid more. No, you won’t become, like, a billionaire - but you can gradually push your pay up through the pay scale over the course of your career if you want to. Learn new skills, be pro-social and make friends with coworkers, be a good employee and team player, work hard and create value while making sure you are recognized for it, regularly apply for new jobs - if only to see how hard you can twist someone’s arm for a pay raise, and make strategic changes in your career path if you see your current one stagnating. When you have valuable skills and experience, you can use these skills to negotiate for higher pay - this is economics 101. None of it is novel or difficult to figure out. You literally just have to put in the effort when it is boring, uncomfortable, socially awkward, scary, frustrating, and annoying. 95% of people do this almost never and that is totally fine. If you like your current job and pay scale, there is no reason to change. But if you want something different, the path is right there, waiting to be walked.

            • elephantium@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              29 days ago

              Yes it is possible to get paid more

              This is an important point/nuance in this space. There’s a fair amount that we can each do as individuals to improve our lots. It doesn’t mean the system is fair or reasonable, but it does mean we have a little more agency than the “doomer” rhetoric suggests.

              It’s rare to see any sort of optimism in these threads.

            • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              29 days ago

              Realistically you can get what? 10x more than your starting salary though the course of your career?

              Whereas being born into the right family means you can be paid 1000x for a fraction of the effort.

              Would you want to split it 50/50 with a person like that?

              • blarghly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                29 days ago

                Sure, your numbers are probably correct. But also I was thinking of, like, someone who makes 45k dating someone who makes 150k - eg, a teacher dating a doctor or something. I, personally, can’t imagine dating someone who makes, say, a 100 million dollar salary.

                • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  But a teacher can’t realistically increase their salary to the doctor’s level through hard work.

                  Actually a doctor generally can’t increase much either unless they work private and are paid per patient.

                  In any case, using the 50k vs 150k example, the 150k earner will generally have more than 3x the disposable income. Still seems pretty unfair to split things 50/50.

                  It’s easier just dating someone in the same income bracket.

          • blarghly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            30 days ago

            And my point is that your standards for relationship fairness are not the same as mine, and I’m not accepting them as objective truth as implied by the imperative you led with two comments ago.