Overtaxed and unpaid air traffic controllers are resigning “every day” due to stress from the government shutdown.

“Controllers are resigning every day now because of the prolonged nature of the shutdown,” Nick Daniels, president of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, told CNN.

“We hadn’t seen that before. And we’re also 400 controllers short—shorter than we were in the 2019 shutdown.”

Air traffic controllers are federal workers, which means they are part of the approximately 730,000 federal employees working without pay since the shutdown began on Oct. 1.

  • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 days ago

    shorter than we were in the 2019 shutdown.

    Ah, so there was a shutdown in 2019 as well. Anyone know if there was anything in common between 2019 and 2025? In, idk the American government or something? Any important people in common between 2019 and 2025?

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    No government: good for the people oppressed by the State

    No planes: good for the climate.

    • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 days ago

      Unfortunately, the “people” benefiting most from less state “oppression” are corporations.

      The rest of the people are still being plenty oppressed e.g. by masked goons claiming to work for the government. Shutdown or no shutdown.

      Meanwhile, the government is literally letting people starve for political reasons.

      As for the planes, I agree.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yes, it seems that we’re focusing on the wrong thing here

        The narrative shouldn’t be parties diagreeing on policy (to get the gov up again). The narrative should be on why the fuck we’re letting ICE and the executive continue to operate during a shutdown, and how we’re going to force them to cease and desist

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      no government means no one’s being paid to stop assholes who need enforced laws to keep them from fucking over humanity. Look at how bad it is now *with government and laws *

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Get out now, the government is never reopening and this will be our new future.

    This is the small government the GOP base wanted.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Kinda hope THIS government never reopens but I’m not going to leave, I want to help establish the “something better” that’s going to come after this shit is gone.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I actually think this is a risky play for the ruling class because the average USian rarely flies. It is the wealthy management class of the US that utilizes airline travel extensively, and their jobs are useless and in large part unnecessary.

    What happens when the business shell game of moving naive idiots with expensive watches around on jets to give the appearance of important business happening is shattered when the people who do actual work in this country keep showing up and getting real work done while the management class is utterly grounded from flights being cancelled en masse?

    If I was part of the ruling class this would be making me VERY worried.

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      No, the country is on fire sale. They’re loading up to head to greener pastures. Destroying US flight means that an alternative they’ve invested in can rise. Just wait until ATC globally is done in Chinese instead, then it’ll make sense.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    I can’t really think of a country more reliant on air travel than the US. They should all just stop turning up for work.

  • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Could someone please explain to me what this shutdown is? I thought it’s only for government “meeting” for voting etc, but why it also affects federal workers?

    • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 days ago

      No, the shutdown is because Congress didn’t pass a budget to allocate new federal funding. Which means that government agencies don’t have any money to pay employees. For most, this means they’re furloughed (essentially mandatory unpaid leave), because being forced to work without pay is also called slavery. Some positions, though (like ATC), are considered too vital to shut down so they do it anyway, and in the past provisions would be included in the budgets to give backpay as appropriate. There’s some worry that El Taco isn’t going to do that this time around, though.

        • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          7 days ago

          Because AmericaOS is still running v0.2 and has no provisions for federal level elections outside the normal election cycle.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 days ago

          We have no concept here of triggering an election. All of our Federal elections are for set terms, no matter what. We don’t have any notion of a “no confidence” vote in government. If we did, I bet it would fail every time.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Pretty much the entire US Constitution is built around the ideas of people acting in good faith. And, even with just the first thirteen states, that wasn’t a horrible idea. Understand that even the East Coast of the US still stretches across a good chunk of the modern day EU and the idea that you were electing a representative to travel for a few days to vote for you made more sense. Similarly, if they were a complete a-hole they would be shunned by all their rich white friends because that was poor decorum.

          So the idea that you would have elected officials dismantling the government with no recourse was quite gauche.

          Whereas many (most?) modern day parliamentary systems cover a much smaller amount of land and many of them actually date back to the mid 1900s where cars, planes, and phones were very much a thing and rapid un-fucking (or at least differently-fucking…) of the government was an option.

          All of which goes to say that maybe we should spend less time glazing rich white slavers and more time modernizing the government

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s even worse than that. They passed a budget, but need a separate vote for actually authorizing the money to be spent.

        Congress set it up this way, on purpose, so that small-government types would have an additional opportunity to negotiate shit that’s already been negotiated.

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            No, the budget was passed as the One Big Beautiful Bill. It was passed without Democratic support because the Senate used the Budget Reconciliation process to bypass the filibuster. But now, the Senate cannot again use Reconciliation to pass any of the two competing appropriations bills. (And as far as I know, neither bill actually performs the appropriations from the budget, and just keeps current spending levels in place, with the Democratic bill adding the healthcare fix.)

            The OBBB includes provisions that fucks over healthcare. The House appropriations bill kept those things in place. The Senate rejected it, then the House stopped working.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              The OB3 was not a budget. It was a series of laws/proclamations that would be funded in the future.

              The fiscal year ended last month. Hence the need for a budget for the current fiscal year.

              Please educate yourself more rather than spew propaganda that favors trump and the chuds.

              • dhork@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                wrong

                The OBBB was passed through the budget reconciliation process, which allows it to be passed in the Senate without a cloture vote, but also limits it to strictly budgetary items. It is a budget bill, full stop. It has to be I order to be passed through the Reconciliation process.

                The current shutdown has nothing to do with the budgetary process, it has to do with a lack of appropriations.

                I don’t block many people, but I am blocking you, because you are a troll.

                • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  For the benefit of people who aren’t plugging their ears and screaming that daddy trump already fixed the economy:

                  I recommend actually reading through https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Big_Beautiful_Bill_Act as it is a fairly unbiased coverage.

                  But, in a nutshell: the OB3 is not a budget. It is a list of proclamations. Some of those have budgetary implications but they are only a subset of what the government is responsible for. The chuds not understanding what the government does? Just as crazy now as all the other fucking times it happens.

                  An actual congressional budget gets shockingly in depth. It is just that nobody, congress included, gives a shit about the individual line items.

                  As a metaphor that The Internet will lose its mind over because metaphors are complicated: The OB3 is like saying you are going to set aside money next year to go on a vacation… where you beat up trans people. It is a step towards a budget but it doesn’t say where that money comes from or what else you’ll do next year. That is the ACTUAL budget that needs to pass by the start of the fiscal year.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        But iys more complicated than that. Some functions, like military , are funded for multiple years, so they’re getting paid. And Republicans passed funding for gestapo, so they’re getting paid.

        And a few things like SNAP (food stamps) have contingency funding because they’re too critical to interrupt …. Yet it’s still a victim of political games

        • Niquarl@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think I read na article that said the Pentagon diverted funding to pay wages so I guess they just HD extra money they could spend

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s a stupid American thing. They need a proper form of government.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s actually the opposite. Congress gets paid and should be working during a shutdown. Although shutdowns shouldnt even exist and only came out of an AG memo from the Reagan administration.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      So, imagine you live at home in a completely dysfunctional family. You are responsible for grocery shopping. Your mother gives you $600 a month, and a weekly grocery list for $200 a week. You have to buy everything on the list. You can’t take more than $600 a month.

      When you run out of money, your mom berates you for overspending. When you don’t buy everything on the list, she berates you for not doing your job.

      That’s our federal government under normal conditions.

      Now imagine that you’re a total piece of shit, but your abusive father won’t let your mother strangle you and bury you in the back yard.

      That’s our federal government since January.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        This is a horrible explanation, tbh. Or rather - it’s good up to the second to last paragraph when the whole thing just derails into off-topic.

        Also: the $600 a month comes from both parents.

        Also-also: it happened in October, not in January.

        So, the fixed paragraph would be something like:

        Now imagine that one month your parents can’t agree to who gives you what portion of the $600, or if the amount should be changed. This means that you’re not getting any money at all.

        That’s our federal government since October.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’d put it like this:

          Your mom and dad give you a credit card plus $600 in allowance each month and expect you to cover all expenses, including groceries, maintenance, plus the cost of hiring a cleaning service using those, which totals $800 per month. Oh, also a bunch of guns, so it’s more like $1100 per month.

          Anyways, every now and then, your credit card hits its limit and mom and dad need to agree to raise the credit limit. And if they don’t, then you refuse to pay for anything. Except the guns, but they are only like $300, so the $600 a month will cover them easily.

          Oh but the cleaning staff should still come, they just won’t get paid until the credit limit is raised.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            I get the joke and it is funny, but since we’re explaining stuff to someone who has no clue:

            1. The US military budget is barely something like 3% of the federal budget, so - if the budget was $800 - with “a bunch of guns” it would be $832. Hilariously, the healthcare budget is around 20%, which just shows how insanely fucked up the healthcare system is in the US.
            2. “The guns” are still not being paid during a shutdown. Republicans are now struggling to find some financing for the military, and just recently a “mystery donor” gave $130 mil so that soldiers could be paid. I guess they remembered that when you’re building a nazi state, you need military standing firmly behind you.
        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Also-also: it happened in October, not in January.

          In my example, the indefinite “you” is an orange doofus who arrived in January.

          I was a little inconsistent on who wanted to bury him and who was stopping him from being buried. Suffice it to say that everyone involved is terrible, and the best we can hope for is a giant meteor.

          Basically, I explained both “What” and “Why”.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            In my example, the indefinite “you” is an orange doofus who arrived in January.

            That’s my point - you veered off into an off-topic tangent when the guy asked about the mechanics of a government shutdown.

            best we can hope for is a giant meteor.

            Couldn’t agree more!

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        "Excellent question! This isn’t just air traffic control. This is air traffic controlGPT. Here’s how to bring in your plane for a safe and effective landing:

        1. The first step—and this is critical—is to check for a runway. Without a runway, your landing may be bumpier than usual.
        2. …"
  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t see why you would do that job if know you’re going to frequently go for weeks / months without pay once every year or two, you’re constantly understaffed, and you’re working like this in 2025…

  • Nomorereddit@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    While this story kind of adds up and emotionally feels right… Always be wary those who aren’t providing the data. How many resigned?

    It sucks being air traffic control, but getting a job in this climate is d*** near impossible If you’re a government worker.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who introduced a bill to pay both federal workers required to work during the shutdown and those who are furloughed. This proposal was supported by several unions representing federal workers but was ultimately blocked by Senate Democrats. https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/07/politics/shutdown-congress-federal-pay-vote

      So I’m confused. Was this another bill?

      E: https://lemmy.world/comment/20388431 helped clear that up a bit. Thanks friend.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      The first time I’m reading about this. If the situation were reversed Republicans would be on every show everywhere repeating this taking point.

      Democrats need to fucking hammer the Republicans on this 24/7 on every outlet possible.

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          If so the Democrats could act like it by showing what happens when they try to say what they aren’t allowed to say.

          At which point you could say that the Democrats are owned by the far right, at which point “far right” becomes an impractical phrase to use to distinguish between the likes of AOC and Mamdani and the likes of Trump.

          So no, the news media aren’t owned by the far right. They are owned by the same people that own the Democrats and Republicans, which have a diverse range of right wing opinions none of which include stopping fascists that got elected through the system that they rely on for their wealth and power.

          If the DNC wanted to hammer the Republicans on this, then by the same token the news media would want to let them. But the DNC doesn’t want to encourage opposition too much because they know they and their owners would lose massive amounts of money if there was any kind of structural reform.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        “Best we can do is fund spoiler candidates after our boy lost the NYC democratic primary”

      • paranoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The bill is called “The true shutdown fairness act”, and it is a poorly named response to the republican “shutdown fairness act”.

        The main differences between the bills (which aren’t really covered in the news, but you can read the bills) is that the shutdown fairness act was limited to excepted employees (those who have to work without pay), as well as some military personnel and some contractors. But it gave trump discretion about who could get paid, and did nothing for furloughed employees, nor guarantee all service members or contractors get paid (again, because it allowed trump to pick and choose)

        The true shutdown fairness act aimed to ensure all federal employees and service members get paid, and prevent mass firings during the shutdown. I don’t know/understand why this bill was rejected (I’ll edit if I can find anything)

        This post and this post go into a bit more detail.

        Edit: I can’t find a news article with direct quotes, but this is part of the ai overview (so take it with a grain of salt)

        Underlying reasons: Democrats opposed the Republican bill because they felt it would grant the President too much power to decide which employees would be paid and which would not. Republicans, in turn, blocked the Democratic bill, with Johnson expressing concern that it would limit the President’s ability to manage the government and potentially reduce the workforce.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    8 days ago

    WHY can’t these GREEDY Air Traffic Controllers just BUCKLE DOWN so until we can CONFIRM that STARVING CHILDREN WILL NOT BE GETTING FOOD and that HEALTH CARE INSURANCE WILL BECOME UNAFFORDABLE FOR AMERICANS?

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I say good. People need to feel this and they need to know exactly why it is happening. It needs to be undeniable.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Sounds like no one invited you anywhere for Thanksgiving.

        Funny how some people are always ready to have other folks suffer for a good cause.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Lol yeah you got me.

          I have to believe that you are purposely misconstruing my comment. I don’t want any of this to happen. I have, however, been paying close attention to politics for over two decades now, and I know what it takes for even a small % of these people to ever consider changing their minds about politics.

          These people are pathologically stubborn in the face of new evidence. They will do the exact opposite of what a scientist says they should do simply because they made them feel stupid for suggesting they might know better.

          They also believe empathy is evil, and therefore a huge chunk of them are literally incapable of grasping something until it affects them directly. We’ve seen it happen over and over and over again.

          • Ava@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Right, but the issue here is that nobody agrees on who is at fault. Nobody is given reason to change their minds, because it’s “the other side” causing it, regardless of which side they’re on. It’s a problem that is definitely affecting real people, but “we’re not the ones causing it” is an easy way to ignore responsibility.

            That’s not to say the shutdown should end, or that it isn’t obvious that the administration isn’t willing to come to the table, but I don’t think I agree with your above point that there’s anything undeniable to be found.

        • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          8 days ago

          Ahh Reagan, he may not be the only one that caused us to get to where we are, but he did a phenomenal job teaching the next generation how to fuck up everything for everyone.

          • can_you_change_your_username@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            8 days ago

            He’s pretty much directly responsible for the atc problems. Their union went on strike during his presidency and he did mass firings and union busting. It takes years to fully train and qualify an atc and the job has an incredible amount of stress. They aren’t easy to recruit and train. We’ve had a national shortage of atc since his firings. If he had negotiated with them in good faith we wouldn’t have had a sudden shortage that we couldn’t catch up from then and their working conditions would have improved making them easier to recruit and train.

            • Yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              So to be fair, it was illegal for them to strike. No government worker, federal, state, or local, is allowed to strike. This is why blue outs (originally police all calling sick at the same time but now applied to all government workers) are a thing.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            8 days ago

            So many of today’s problems are because of the Confederate Party, and the kinds of things they did and the things they schemed about since Nixon and since Ronnie Raygun especially.

            They were thoroughly outraged that Nixon had to resign in complete disgrace and vowed to combat that in the media space at least. Ronnie Raygun’s maladministration helped to enable that with the dismantling of the Fairness Doctrine…

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        8 days ago

        The very last thing you want on a job is old timers who have been through terrible situations and know shortcuts and tricks to get through it.

        Institutional memory? Bah! We have MBA’s!

      • LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 days ago

        I mean I wouldn’t want to have a federal position now…. Who knows when you could next be expected to work with no pay for a month or more because a bunch of fascist babies aren’t quite getting their way.