also: a lot of modern pixar movies are themselves massmarket-appeal-slop, everything has to be as soft and childlike as possible because that’s what works best. Even if AI wasn’t trained on them they’d probably end up making similar things just because it’s trained to make things as appealing as possible.
Why do you think a high prolific Disney animation movie would be marketed with AI images, when they have a whole movie of human made images they can use?
Why do those images look like AI slop
Generative AI was trained on a lot of Pixar movies.
also: a lot of modern pixar movies are themselves massmarket-appeal-slop, everything has to be as soft and childlike as possible because that’s what works best. Even if AI wasn’t trained on them they’d probably end up making similar things just because it’s trained to make things as appealing as possible.
I miss Don Bluth.
mostly because AI slop was designed to look like that, which is already a dated art style.
Or because its actually AI slop…
Hollywood is pushing a lot for AI movies
I think AI enslopifiying that style was the nail in the coffin.
Artist will need to be creative and genuinely push animation to new levels, like puss in boots or spider verse.
something AI is inherently incapable of doing.
The late Pixar ultrasmooth aesthetic is one ov the things the ruling class’s slop machines can slop out with especial ease
Most of the things slop.exe can almost kinda do were sloppified themselves into vapid shells of themselves long before.
Why do you think a high prolific Disney animation movie would be marketed with AI images, when they have a whole movie of human made images they can use?
deleted by creator
Disnaiy
if generative AI generates the disney logo, it’ll finaly spell gisnep