schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@programming.dev · 2 months agoBugs Found in sudowww.linux-magazine.comexternal-linkmessage-square8linkfedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down12cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
arrow-up127arrow-down1external-linkBugs Found in sudowww.linux-magazine.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square8linkfedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
minus-square0x0@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up20·edit-22 months agoThe vulnerability in question would’ve still happened if written in rust, it was not a memory leak. More an instance of feature creep, as the solution was to remove the functionality.
minus-squareComexs@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoWould something like ‘doas’ have the same issue?
minus-square0x0@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI don’t believe so and it has been suggested as an alternative.
minus-squaree8d79@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months agoI would rather go with a completely new approach like the one of run0.
So ‘sudo-rs’ guys were right?
The vulnerability in question would’ve still happened if written in rust, it was not a memory leak.
More an instance of feature creep, as the solution was to remove the functionality.
Would something like ‘doas’ have the same issue?
I don’t believe so and it has been suggested as an alternative.
I would rather go with a completely new approach like the one of
run0.Rusty Bois are never right!