• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Dems let the Dems gut it.

    I don’t disagree. The original had more stuff in it that I liked.

    There wasn’t a Republican that supported it.

    True. The GOP rejected it for many stupid reasons.

    The massive partisan wall that created is a huge reason why things are so fucked now.

    This statement confuses me. Are you suggesting the Dems should have let the GOP gut it MORE? Are you suggesting the Dems should have dropped the legislation altogether to “keep the peace”? What are you saying the Dems could have done so “things are so fucked now”?

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes the Dems should have got some gop votes. It may have made the bill slightly worse, but not by much. In return the Democrats would have had far more negotiating power with there own members if there were a couple of the more purple Republicans that they could count on instead. It also would have prevented the bill from being a great campaign piece for Republicans, and it might not have resulted in one of the largest midterm swings ever.

      Getting 95% of the ACA and a Congress that wasn’t deadlocked for the next 6 years would have been much better overall. A split government that functioned more like under Clinton or Bush would have been much better than what ended up happening. The decision to stonewall when they had power unsurprisingly backfired.