This is a good summary. At this point I am too deeply invested in to NextCloud to switch to a different thing, as I’ve switched my whole family off OneDrive now and I just cba to go through that again. I can handle it being dogshit and I’ve got used to it’s bugs - a form of stockholm syndrome. I suspect a lot of people are similar to me - we use NextCloud because it’s the biggest name and has been around forever, not because it’s what we want.

Anyway, performance is clearly a problem, and has been since I started on OwnCloud 10 years ago. I wish the devs would do something to improve it but again, having used it for 10 years, I know that they won’t. When it finally blows up I’ll move to something else I guess.

Until verification is complete, access to [social features] will be limited to friends only

don’t threaten me with a good time

Calling that shopping centre “iconic” and “legendary” is hilarious.

The proposals have received 784 responses from the public, comprising 105 objections, 637 responses in support and 42 neutral comments.

637 out of 784 in support is pretty overwhelming.

The OSA should have been explicitly worded to exclude organisations like the Wikimedia Foundation from its scope. Clearly the intent of the law was not to clamp down on the Wikimedia Foundation, so the law should have been written such that the Wikimedia Foundation fell clearly outside of its scope. It’s just very poorly drafted.

I’ve read the act and it’s not clear at all. There is a legal risk if you run a small site about a legal subject with a comment section or forum now that didn’t exist before, which was not the stated intent of the law, and which results from the legislation being poorly drafted.

How good can fish and chips get realistically? Like the difference between the best chippy in London and the best chippy within 15 minutes of your home can’t be that big surely?