Das ist mir auch aufgefallen. Wollte eine stinknormale billige 100g Haselnusstafel kaufen und hab die für 1,29€ dann auch liegen lassen.

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

This statement in the same week as Yves installs his son as Co-CEO in charge of their biggest franchises. A man who entered the industry as a CEO of a mobile company and then founded a AI/NFT/crypto game company that is being liquidated now.

Pure nepotism. The Guillemont family is the parasite that is killing Ubisoft.

Gutachten entlastet Brosius-Gersdorf

Wenn der Journalismus nicht immer den rechten Narrativen nachplappern würde, könnte man einen Titel wählen, der diese aktiv entkräftigt. Hier wird gleich wieder suggeriert, dass Sie überhaupt entlastet werden muss.

“Gutachten zeigt die Vorwürfe gegen Brosius-Gersdorf haben keine Grundlage” FTFThem

The article lists four things about the cyclist.

1. “not wearing a helmet”

Admittedly a no-go for me. There a lots of options for anyone.

2. “was wearing “relatively” dark clothing”

“Relatively” already gives the impression that we aren’t talking black, just that it wasn’t a signal or hi-vis color.

3. “using an earphone”

This wording makes me think the cyclist used one earbud and not both or full headphones. So he could hear his surroundings well.

4. “his front light may not have been working”

Not even a fact, but a possibility.

To summarize, he was a traffic participant in a non-signal color, listening to music. That’s it.

Of course cyclist are more vulnerable than cars, but anyone who sees fault in the cyclist behavior is often overlooking similar or worse behavior in drivers.

Nobody ever asks the owner of a black car if they have a death wish or ask someone to turn of the radio, because they can’t hear the traffic as well.

I wish people would hold all traffic participants to the same standards.