A few of you mentioned the “indent” - I never even saw it until I zoomed way in on the photo I took after you mentioned it. I can’t even see it in person. My vision isn’t great, but I think that suggests even more strongly a bad design.

I agree, if you have POTS then you can send a fax if the printer has a modem installed. I don’t happen to have a POTS landline.

As others said, Searxng is a search proxy. Any given instance can be configured to return results from vary many sources. Why would the results vary with repeated identical search? Not sure, but perhaps a bit of randomness is in the algorithm of which sites yo return results from, or which order to display them in. Also possible: latency may vary and so for each search a different result set is retrieved first.

Thanks for that explanation, @rikudou@lemmings.world!

Googled earned about $325B in 2024. $30M is about .009% of that. If you earn $50K per year, it would be like you had to pay $4.50 for committing a crime.

It’s been a few weeks, @just_another_person@lemmy.world … Did you release anything? Any hints as to what may be coming?

I also like/use CryptPad. FYI, it’s self-hostable.

Cryptpad is also self-hostable, if that’s your bag.

Wow that’s a lot to process! Thanks for the explanations, #sga@lemmings.world !

You suggested a 20b model but OP said they have 8G VRAM (and 32G RAM). I thought a [very] rough approximation of VRAM size needed for a model was 1:1 with billion parameters (so 20G VRAM in this example). It seems I’m wrong. What’s a better approximation or heuristic to use?

Here’s the Readme from the commit when he discontinued Tesseract.

Here’s a post where the developer explains his reasons.

I use Tesseract, which is fantastic. Be wary, though: the developer recently put the project in maintenance mode and swore off the fediverse, then i guess changed his mind and continues to develop it - it’s certainly possible it could happen again.

Let’s find out. One… two-hoo… three. CRUNCH. Three.

Thanks for the explanations, @Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech.

I introduced myself to tools/functions in Open-WebUI: there is a community library of tools/functions and you can essentially copy/paste them into Open-WebUI and then they’re available there. If I understand correctly, tools add functionality to models and functions add functionality to Open-WebUI.

I’m still confused, though: if I add a web search tool to Open-WebUI (some do exist), I would guess that it could only ever add functionality to the model if I access the model through Open-WebUI - but HA is accessing the model directly through Ollama.

Thanks for the reply and the assistance, @just_another_person@lemmy.world.

I’m not using any add-ons in Home Assistant for this integration, just the Ollama integration (but I suspect that’s what you meant).

Its docs say that it doesn’t integrate with sentence triggers, so I think this suggestion won’t work. :(

This is interesting. Thanks for sharing your test results.

Do I understand correctly that if your computer shares a fingerprint with fewer computers, it’s more distinguishable/identifiable?

When I last checked, it didn’t seem difficult to flash my Dreametech L10s Ultra, but there was a step where if you didn’t get it done within X seconds, you brick your vacuum. No idea if that’s accurate, but didn’t want to risk a $1000 vacuum on it, so I sadly still use it connected to cloud (because I want to use mapping functionality).

Image failed to load: that’s mildly infuriating!

I’ll look into this. 🙁