• 2 Posts
  • 38 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle



  • Not really, in LoTr, they have a magical sword that shines around orcs, another one that can stop a ghost sword, and there are being with biological powers beyond the grasp of our understanding.

    I think you are confusing setting with genre. By your logic the star wars and star trek porn parodies are also sci-fi and not porn.

    Sci-fi is only sci-fi if science plays an integral role in the story, eg. Expanse, Stargate (shows), Star trek. But these are all arguably in space, so I get your confusion, that’s the setting, shows like Black Mirror and For all mankind are also sci-fi and those are present day things.

    Well actually For all mankind plays out in an alternate past where the space race continues (though I guess this is also technically in space).

    Black mirror explores humanity through the lense of abusing technological/scientific inventions.

    So those are science based fictions, sci-fi.

    Star Wars is space fantasy, arguably if we live in an alternate universe and the original trilogy is released in the late 2000s and 2010s they could be dubbed as YA. Random teenager protagonist finds out they are indeed special and helps to overthrow an opressive regime, like Divergent, Hunger games, Maze runner



  • Well after making this comment i have actually looked into it, ofc Europe is leading on this thing

    from google AI overview

    Several European countries are implementing legislation to encourage or mandate the installation of solar panels on parking lots, especially larger ones. This is part of the EU’s push for renewable energy and energy efficiency, making use of parking areas as potential sites for solar generation.

    EU Level:

    • The EU’s Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) aims to make zero-emission buildings the standard and requires new buildings to be “solar-ready.”
    • The EPBD promotes solar energy use in buildings and encourages installing solar panels on certain existing non-residential buildings, including parking lots.
    • The EU has set deployment targets for photovoltaics, recognizing parking lots as a key area for development.
    • The EU is also working on a “Solar Standard” to further drive solar adoption in buildings and parking lots.

    National Legislation:

    • France: Requires solar panels on existing and new car parks over 1,500 m², with deadlines for compliance.
    • Slovenia: Introduced requirements for solar panel installation on new parking lots.
    • Greece: Stipulates 60% coverage of large open car parks with solar panels.
    • Germany: Many federal states have made solar panels on car parks a legal obligation.
    • Netherlands: Has large-scale solar carport installations, including one of the world’s largest in Biddinghuizen.
    • Austria: Introducing similar legislation to encourage solarization of parking lots.
    • Spain: Legislation is also encouraging solar panel installations on parking lots.








  • You see, I wanted to be petty and do another dismissive reply, but instead I fed our convo to copilot and asked it to explain, here you go, as you can see I have previously used it for coding tasks, so I didn’t feed it any extra info, so there you go, even copilot can understand the huge “leap” I made in logic. goddamn the sweet taste of irony.

    Copilot reply:

    Certainly! Here’s an explanation Person B could consider:

    The implied logic in Person A’s argument is that if you distrust code written by Copilot (or any AI tool) simply because it wasn’t written by you, then by the same reasoning, you should also distrust code written by junior developers, since that code also isn’t written by you and may have mistakes or lack experience.

    However, in real-world software development, teams regularly review, test, and maintain code written by others—including juniors, seniors, and even AI tools. The quality of code depends on review processes, testing, and collaboration, not just on who wrote it. Dismissing Copilot-generated code outright is similar to dismissing the contributions of junior developers, which isn’t practical or productive in a collaborative environment.







  • Do you use an IDE for writing your code or do you use a notepad like a “real” programmer? An IDE like Intellij has fancy shit like generating getters, setters, constructors, equals hashscode, you should never use those, real programmers write those by hand.

    Your attention detail is very good btw, which I am ofc being sarcastic about because if you had any you’d have noticed I have never said I write my code with chat gpt, I said Unit tests, sql for unit tests.

    Ofc attention to detail is not a requirement of software engineering so you should be good. (This was also sarcasm I feel like you need this to be pointed out for you).

    Also by your implied logic that the code being not written by you = bad, no company should ever hire Junior engineers, I mean what are you gonna do? Fucking read the code they wrote?