

I’ve not tested memrise so I can’t compare.


I’ve not tested memrise so I can’t compare.


It seems they do: https://www.mondly.com/offer/en


Mondly is good, but I don’t know which Spanish it teaches.

DDoSecrets delivers, as always: https://ddosecrets.org/article/kash-patel-emails
The initial tranche includes 324 emails that were released by Handala, which has indicated that more data will be released.


And CoMaps is its fork.


Je me base souvent sur ce tableau pour la comparaison (mais c’est LineageOS sans MicroG dedans) : https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm
Et c’est vrai que GrapheneOS ne supporte plus un téléphone dès que le support officiel s’arrête. Je comprend leur raison mais ça reste dommage. C’est un peu moins grave depuis le 8 car le support official passe à 7 ans. En espérant que ce sera mieux avec Motorola.
J’ai envie de passer à GrapheneOS depuis longtemps mais mon téléphone actuel (sous LineageOS, pas un Pixel) n’a encore que 7 ans, c’est vrai que c’est jeune pour changer. Peut être quand le Motorola sortira, à voir ce qu’il vaudra.


Pourquoi LineageOS alors que GrapheneOS supporte le Fold ?


Est-ce que tu as essayé darktable ?
Edit : je découvre qu’Ansel est un fork de darktable.


I highly doubt the users could get away with such an excuse but I’m not a lawyer. And the complaint comes from the football ligue rights holders, there is not ethics to be found here.


selling piracy services
That’s exactly the subject here.


France copyright law does not allow full length reproduction, whatever the intent. It does not apply here and it’s not why they are going after the customers here.


Telegram never was the private alternative to anything, unless you took their advertisement at face value. It was always known to not use e2ee by default.
Signal is not a problem, the US gov things were very dumb users issues. It was not caused by Signal itself.
So the goalpost has not moved in years, Signal was and is still good, Telegram is only fine if you do not care about privacy.


That’s not my claim.


Lol, “do your own research”.


This is not about me but about the advice you give to people. If you give advices you need to back them up, you can’t just answer “I disagree” to contradiction.


I’m not saying you said it was precise. I’m just saying that not every layer is important, or even good.
What if there are less people using that VPN IP than using that ISP IP, now your are giving more information with a VPN than without. How do you verify the claim that a VPN does not log? Spoiler, you can’t verify, it’s just trust. You have to chose who you trust enough to give them access to the website you visit.


You’re dodging the issue. Why would an IP that’s shared and does not give precise location be as important as precise GPS location?


No, those are not “layer of abstraction” and they do not have equal importances, claiming otherwise is counter-productive. Each data does not reveal the same quantity of information and their hierarchy depends on your threat model.


I don’t think that’s true for mobile IPs since they are shared.
You need someone to change the cable for you without you knowing which one it is, otherwise the test is worthless.