Help is always welcome. Here the Template: https://pawb.social/comment/16659629

I know that Unicode results in more storage requirements for Asian scripts, but it is still the best thing what happened to the IT world imo.

I might be able to help you with the ticket, but the real challenge is the process of immigration. There you need to be prepared to fight the multi-stage boss named Bureaucracy.

For real, why do we only enable the necessary locale?

I think one reason is efficiency. Update-procedures of some packages involve recompiling some resources for every used locale. Also it would require more space for something the user would rarely ever need.

I kinda lost track what was the most recent version of each image. But the template is currently reworked in the Matrix chat. If you can please join and post your request there. If not add a link to the image here and I will relay it.

I saw. So now I know I posted a correct room-link ^^

Room created; see https://kbin.earth/m/furry@pawb.social/t/1601373.

@KoboldCoterie@pawb.social

The dimensions say 60x52 pixels so I think the blur comes from the browsers zoom.

Both approaches have valid arguments and honestly I can’t say which would be better for our group.

Regarding organization: I think with a central and fast communication it would be doable. Other groups use Matrix. We (I) could also create a group. This would add the benefit that we could get a number on how many people have how much time to pixel and so plan our resources.

@KoboldCoterie@pawb.social @OmegaMouse@pawb.social @Ethanol@pawb.social @l_b_i@pawb.social

I really like your Idea to place it for possible convenient expansion. Expansion to the side is likely yes, but I think it looks better with the horizontal cut like it is now.

The advantage of a collection in one place is that it is easier to make a template of and so to organize.

Hmmmm, yea the size is problematic. How should we decide on what to omit or try to shrink further (e621 has much potential)?

Other possibility would be to assign priorities and when something couldn’t be finished, then it is what it is.

If no more edits are are added 'til tomorrow I will allocate an area and add a comment to the template-finer thread in c/canvas (but no pressure, I will edit the comment if the template should be changed afterwards). Any wishes for position? If not I will gravitate towards the top right corner.

@KoboldCoterie@pawb.social @OmegaMouse@pawb.social @Ethanol@pawb.social @l_b_i@pawb.social @tblFlip@pawb.social

My current proposal. I think we should also talk about the sizes of easier-to-scale elements. The Pawb logo is one of the smallest, but I scaled it that way as we currently already have quite the amount of pixels.

I found a post which has the palette in bigger + color-codes.

https://feddit.org/post/15281164

I think we should compact the arrangement, so that we don’t compete for so much area.
The blue Pawb logo can be shrunk and then put into the space between RAM and the Kobold. The green dragon head fits under the sword (to the right). Boykisser can then take its place.

Do you have a Gimp project-file? Because this PNG is not to scale and I would like to help with the refinement of the Yiffit logo. I can also create a shared Nextcloud folder if you want.

The second last point is the most enraging to me. Either show me a loading overlay or don’t move the items a single pixel!

Beautiful

Also maybe we should create a collage of all planned Furry-Pixels and allocate a space here.

I checked the color palette and made all pixels fit. The background is transparent; so other small artworks can be integrated in the empty spaces.

I think I will start from the head and the see how far down I can go.

I tried to Pixel RAM, here is the result:

I also did another one, but I think the first one is better.

They are not very small (96px on the long side) but scaling them more down made the results to bad.