If AIPAC gets a special ban, then different groups with their own least favorite will ask why we aren’t banning that one, and billionaire owned media will say the DNC supports that.

The only logical solution that doesn’t waste a shit ton of time and effort, is to blanket ban all of them at once.

They don’t have infinite time and energy waste on shit. The more individual ones moving, the slower the one that abns everyone moves…

So the dnc released all the information on what was banned to actually help people check if they actually banned pacs and dark money?

The votes that just happened were at the committee level…

After that it goes to all voting members.

Expect a statement after that vote.

The DNC has released nothing about either, because they never do until after the full vote.

Like, I think your confusion is you think the DNC was making any announcements about this stuff, when it was just the billionaire owned media from CNN to Faux News all “independently” releasing the same stories almost verbatim within minutes of each other.

Can you honestly not see how this is a hot job against the DMC because the people who control the media no longer control the DNC?

Step 1: have monies

that requires a tiny bit of literacy

Literally the opposite of what’s happening here…

But I wouldn’t expect someone that defends AI to be able to realize that, especially if they read OPs post and it seemed logical

Maybe some day “journalists” will stop taking CEOs at their word on how popular AI will be some day…

As you’ll hear Hayden explain here, these are glimmers of a make-or-break moment for the AI industry, as both Anthropic and OpenAI barrel toward two of the biggest IPOs in history. And the pressure on these companies to make money has never been this intense.

The projections these companies have made, which just this week were leaked to the Wall Street Journal, tell a story of mind-boggling growth, to the tune of hundreds of billions in revenue and profitability by the end of the decade.

I don’t understand why people give corps the benefit of the doubt, they’re just lying to juice stock price. There was no “leak” they just want to build hype so they “leaked” something that says their awesome.

It’s just a large demographic…

They need bodies at this point, any bodies.

So they’re aiming at one of the largest demographics for younger generations.

0.01% of video gamers, is more people than 0.01% of all tiddlywinks players.

It doesn’t matter how well it connects, it’s just a large demo that watches a bunch of YouTube videos and will see the ads.

Are all your posts here AI?

They sound like AI trying to sound deep, but it’s just gibberish that usually contradicts itself

"Look, America is founded on free enterprise and capitalism,” said Bill Essayli, the first assistant United States attorney for the central district of California, during the press conference. “Anyone who attacks our values, our way of life, our system, which provides the best goods and services to the most people, we’re gonna come after aggressively.”

Well…

That guy’s a fucking idiot

No rationale person believes any of that shit.

Oh, yeah, it’s clearly against rule 3 and will probably be removed soon

Obviously not…

But I’m saying whether she runs or not, it literally doesn’t matter.

Because she has no chance of winning even a single delegate, just like her last attempts.

I don’t know how to make it any clearer

It literally doesn’t matter if she does…

She’s never been able to get a single delegate in a primary, and the current DNC isn’t going to just hand it to someone.

…

It’s not embarrassing to still be using any Meta product?

It’s like being worried because you recognized the guy in front of you at the checkout line at the dildo emporium as your priest…

It would be awkward if he turns around, but he’s got a shopping cart of dildos too, how is he gonna judge?

I cant tell if those are rhetorical questions because you’re upset…

Or if you genuinely don’t understand why the oligarchs are mad kids aren’t having babies…

At the same time, people drastically overestimate how big of a deal it would be…

Someone could always just stop buying games on there.

And if it did “go away” and people lost their games, they think how much they’ve spent on games over decades, and not how much it would cost to replace what they still play.

Out of all the real life horrible shit going on, very few people have the longevity of Valve as a priority.

It’s not 100% safe but at this point it’s more likely to be here in 20 years than the country it’s based in.

But besides all that, I don’t think you know what the word “monopoly” means if you think steam is one.

DNC Chair Ken Martin touted a resolution passed on April 9 that condemns the “corrosive influence” of dark money on Democratic primaries but does not single out AIPAC or any other specific interest group.

“We had various resolutions that focused on different industries and groups, and instead of going one-by-one, we passed a blanket repudiation,” Martin said on social media, adding that he supports an end to dark money in politics.

Instead of just banning AIPAC by name, they’re going after all the PACs.

For those of you who just started paying attention to politics, AIPAC isnt Israel’s first attempt. The last one had to register as a foreign agent, and AIPAC showed up immediately to replace it’s predecessor.

Ban just AIPAC, and a PAC that’s exactly the same but with a new name shows up and does the same shit.

I understand why billionaire owned media pretends to not understand that, but it’s very depressing that voters seem incapable of realizing it unless a millionaire paid by a billionaire tells them

They’re all gonna start claiming they have “too good to release” versions…

Because everything they release sucks.

But if they never let anyone not financially invested even see the “good one” then no one can say it’s actually shit.

It doesn’t matter if it works, it matters if it raises stock price. So eventually we’ll see them just not release it, it could only hurt the stock price.

OP keeps spamming posts implying it was faked but not actually saying they think it’s fake…

Then deleting the post after people say it clearly wasn’t fake.

Netflix had an amazing show about that, but cancelled it like a week after season 1 premiered.

https://time.com/7317998/billionaires-bunker-ending-explained/

Tldw:

Billonaires think the world is ending and scamper to a bunker.

Twist is that the world isn’t ending, people fucked over by billionaires decided to stage a fake apocalypse and use AI to impersonate them and steal all their money.

And no one cares about the wealthy outside of immediate family, so no one asks questions.

I think it wasn’t just stealing the money, but immediately using it to actually help people.

I’d love to see his legal defense be:

I threw it at the gate because it was just a message. If I wanted to kill him I’d have _____.

Cuz like…

Realistically throwing a moltov at a (presumably) metal gate isn’t the same as attempted murder.

If I was on a jury, that’d be enough for me to say “not guilty” at least.

I don’t think you know what a meme is then…

I knew people stopped reading articles…

I genuinely didn’t know literacy has gotten so bad people won’t read a screenshot of a fucking tweet