• 0 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: January 9th, 2026

help-circle




  • Sorry i deleted my comments because i thought you were saying something you weren’t, and responded ungenerously.

    Your points are well taken, especially concerning silence itself constituting a moral act (or inaction), especially in the context of injustice or deceit.

    My interpretation is that Matthew instructs us towards an active, radical love which demands that we act against what is unjust.

    I recognise that this view of JC stands at the edge of a slippery slope, where violence can be condoned in Christian terms by the great manipulators of the world, but in our historical moment, i see a greater danger in emphasising the pacifist, passive aspects of JC. I am more afraid of his flock becoming domesticated and losing their ability to discern between true and false, and therefore also between right and wrong. I guess I choose to believe it is more wrong to pacify a righteous anger than it is for that righteous anger to miss its mark.

    He entertained the devil during his temptation, and even hinted towards the instrumental nature of evil in the abstract, but he did not hesitate to take great offence at seeing money lenders ply their trade in the house of his Father. In one there is an implied recognition of the value of the work, and in the other a complete rejection.













  • tl:dr when they say ‘I have nothing to hide’ you respond with 'you aren’t even really you without privacy so you can’t really say what ‘you’ have to hide. Then when they give you a confused stare you walk them through the previous logical steps. I’m not sure it’s incredibly persuasive IRL especially to the kind of person who would argue against their own fundamental human rightd in this way (i’ve had similar chats with my own father fwiw) but it’s a good starting point.

    Following up with concrete examples of harm (which don’t rely on a logical chain of propositions) is a good follow up.


  • being monitored (even if you are not aware of it) changes your behaviour via the ‘big brother’ effect.

    Your behaviour is most of what makes you an individual, and is the means through which people express their autonomy and social existence.

    putting these things together gives you the result that you cannot fully be ‘yourself’ while you are being watched. At best you are performing what you’d like ‘yourself’ to be for an expected audience.

    Self actualisation, or the process of developing and becoming ‘yourself’ is therefore disrupted meaning that you can never be or know yourself while you lack real privacy.

    Another (more dramatic) way to say it would be you cannot be fully human without also enjoying a default privacy