No, that is actually the vice president of the USA.

How many of those are developing smartphones?

Thank you for sharing, that was an interesting read. I hadn’t heard of this before.

The first two feedback options do not directly intervene but only provide warnings (first optic and if no response from the driver, a delayed acoustic/vibrating warning), which have to be as short as possible in duration to avoid potential annoyance of the driver.

This part was particularly amusing.

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I am once again asking the question: Why don’t cars have built-in speed regulators?

There’s constant chatter about the potential risks associated with the rise in e-bikes, but little to no mention of regulating the existing menace. You want to talk about excessive power? Look no further.

What kind of topsy turvy, inverse universe are we living in, when environmental concerns are a dirty word?

^rhetorical question, please don’t answer.

I hate to be a language prescriptivist, and I fully recognise that times change, language evolves. But I can’t help but feel frustrated and disappointed that this term become the norm. Everyone has latched on to it, unaware of the connotation, I think. And now it’s here, it feels like it’ll never go away.

I think it’s insensitive that you choose to dunk on the USA in a thread about North Korea.