Rocket Surgeon

  • 7 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 10th, 2025

help-circle
  • Your point is cogent enough and well explained. It seems diconnected tho.
    Try building your own rules. The pieces you seem to think don’t matter are actually where one starts in that project. The gritty business of morality is its foundation.
    I learned my own code of behavior by making a lot of mistakes. I did things I’m not proud of. The things I believe in today had to be slapped into my skull.







  • Community service as punishment is meant to link you back to your community. Where you live. Where you presumably shat. Go clean that up. We live here.

    The common good includes oneself. The tragedy of the commons is only possible when its “somebody else’s problem”. When that’s “my park”, you clean up the shit.

    Yes, people are problematic and largely prone to shitting in the park. They have to be taught. It’s not easy.




  • I unfortunately agree that people largely do not adhere to what one might regard as the normal moral code. In fact there are loud voices saying it is defunct. But its still there. We still use it to judge.
    These are some of the reasons that I feel one should be open to rebuilding the squishy biz that is morals into something based on objective values. This project has been tackled by much better men, and I have nothing to add. Rene Descartes. Immanuel Kant. Even Friedrich Nietzsche had powerful things to say about reworking morals into something that actually works.






  • I’m not gonna read whatever weird BS that came from, but I do think its entirely possible to have a coherent and attractive worldview without morality. If you want to make any sense to normal people, you have to replace it with a belief system that emphasizes community service and the common good. In the end, if it works, it winds up looking just like morality with objective foundations.