If you’re relying on GPS speed limiting, you’ve already failed at designing a safe roadway. It’s a bandaid at best. Besides, how are you supposed to enforce the usage of GPS speed limiting on every bike? Regular bikes are just as capable of significantly exceeding, say, a 15mph (25kph) speed limit as e-bikes. It doesn’t make sense technically, logistically, or politically in the vast majority of places.
I really hate that my demand avoidance is triggered by my own demands perhaps the most. 😑
The only situation this is relevant is if enterprise policy prevents you from installing Firefox. And even then, portable editions exist. So like… ¿¿¿por qué???
Only if you have the setting enabled to cycle in recently used order, otherwise it’s just in tab order. I don’t know why it isn’t on by default, it should be. Defaulting to a different behavior than Alt + Tab is not user-friendly IMO.
Much more tragic on average per occurrence, of course. But, I’d be willing to bet that the chance of falling down that slope is way higher than being hit, and thus the “average damage over time” is far greater for falls than collisions. People are really bad at comprehending risk. (See: dying from a shark attack or lightning strike being more common fears than dying from falling down the stairs.)
It feels wrong to reduce human lives to a numbers game, but that’s what traffic engineering is. If there’s a budget, it has to be a numbers game at some level.