circuscritic

I don’t understand why using the state’s authority to intentionally and illegally destroy someone’s life isn’t being talked about as a capital crime.

If we’re a country that supports the death penalty, we might as well put it to some good use.

I understand why the agents of the state won’t talk about it like that, but I don’t understand why the citizens don’t start talking about it in those terms.

Go to conservative forums, all of the top comments are about how his politics don’t matter, lashing out at “the left” for pointing out his politics, or lamenting the fact that politics are even brought into this terrible tragedy.

I won’t hazard a guess at administrative/bureaucratic staff breakdowns, but you can bet your ass that the people who work inside the prisons, voted overwhelmingly for Trump.

Elect Democrats next presidential cycle and watch them do nothing to prosecute any of the criminal acts by agents of this administration, much less do anything to actually rebalance the economy.

Then watch them lose the following election and blame radical leftists.

This is the way.

That TMZ comment section is a hoot.

That’s so 20th century.

21st century DNC is all about that sweet private equity cash and making land acknowledgments.

Putting your phone down is good, for sure.

But unless you’re planning on not using a smartphone, you might as well take reasonable precautionary measures i.e. using Graphene.

That was great, things for sharing!

The installation couldn’t be more simple…just use the web installer and follow the simple instructions of when to click.

I’ve been installing custom ROMs since 4.0, and the advent of web installers, such as for Graphene, are the easiest ROMs I’ve ever flashed.

Much simpler than even the custom recovery route, which was already fairly straightforward, but this is even easier IMO.

Can you elaborate on their use of the ban hammer of injustice?

I don’t use it, so I’m unaware of any dramas, but mass banning sounds interesting.

That’s my point, I don’t use LLMs for those operations, and I’m aware of their faults, but that doesn’t mean they’re useless.

So yeah, I look forward to the AI bubble popping, but I’m still going to use LLMs for type of tasks they’re actually suited for.

I don’t think many people on Lemmy are under the the spell of AI hype, but plenty of people here are knowledgeable enough to know when, and when not, to leverage this useful, but dangerously overhyped and oversold, piece of technology.

Ask the model to confirm the answer and it will correct itself, at least when I’ve tried that.

I’m sure there’s a mathematical or programmatic logic as to why, but seeing as I don’t need LLM’s to count letters or invent new types of pseudoscience, I’m not overly interested in it.

Regardless, I look forward to the bubble popping.

That’s not what I’m saying.

Giving people more, or better, health insurance, or raising minimum wage, are policies that the donor class feels comes at their expense. Either monetarily, or by giving the peasants more financial freedom, which they view as weakening their strangle hold on society.

They may have moral objections to marijuana, but enough of them also want to get richer off of it, so it’s not the same thing.

Pretty much everything is public on Lemmy.

Not an assumption…votes are public on Lemmy.

No, they down voted my comment and replied because they think they were correcting some mistake I had made.

Either bad English comprehension, or it’s not their native language.

What did I say to contradict that?

CTE and he only played high school football…

I found no record of him playing in college, much less the NFL.

Maybe he did other activities such as amateur or backyard boxing, but my quick search didn’t turn up any professional combat sports in his history.

The Democrats are structurally incapable of making any of those demands, except for legalized weed, as that does not improve the material economic conditions of the 99%.

Anything that improves material economic conditions of the 99% are policies that are violently opposed by their donor class, and the donor class always wins.

I remember not too long ago anyone criticizing New Labour in general, or Starmer specifically, would get lots of down votes and people calling you hysterical, or a conservative shill.

Er, I mean gee, who could have seen this coming?