Artwork

// Image source: Video comments

Thank you… very much, @puckpuckpuckow@lemmy.world …
Not only some are tired of this LLM/“AI”… but the “two kinds/types”? My dear… is it just “two persons” on this planet, world, universe… they consider?

Wonderful day! 🪐

Ha-ha! Of course, it’s okay to add emojis (or even emotes (/ o.o)/) to an accountable CV for responsible job to get trusted for! 😂
Especially those for security 🔒, privacy 🕵️‍♀️, transparency 👁‍🗨…

If I would look at such CV in search 🧭 for a trusted developer 👩‍💻, sys-admin 💻, manager 📜, accountant 💸, and for military forces ( -.-)7, sure thing the pretty pictures would increase the feel of trust to the level of the outer space and beyond!!!1 💪

Oh! And why just LinkedIn? Perhaps to enhance the sense of accountability, some would want to add emojis to some documents, including employment contracts, Banking issues, weaponry certificates, and passports! Let’s make it shine in sparkles! ✨

Look! LOL! OMG! This is the colleague on fields we need! They have these lovely emojis! Let’s hire them right now!
Since, “There’s no crying in Special Forces!”

Perhaps I am too rarely on Facebook/Meta or in Communities that are not into these politics.

I am sorry, but what do you mean by “Russian propaganda”? It feels like I’ve never seen such on Facebook.

What a nonsense, sorry…

Human is human already, regardless how they speak and what they do…
There’s always true sympathy and empathy to find in a human, regardless how busy, dark, erroneous etc. they are…
Yet, it’s the true alive soul inside in every person…

Medics are likely tired, doing their job every single day, yet they have empathy, and will always try to listen if you actually try…
They know what PAIN, AGONY, DEATH, SORROW… fear means…

LLM/“AI” will always pretend to be a human, since it’s “trained”/designed, to be so, and will always be limited and incomplete…
Not to mention the initial dataset of numerous emphatic actual human has its limited memory inside, no one is responsible for.

What a hopeless sorrow is that awful trendy, advertised, mind-atrophying mess…

Holy gracious smokes… These are ineffably magnificent…
Thank you very much for the marvel, art you do…

One of the most interesting parts is that it’s absolutely safe! It’s not dye or another edible ingredients, but a physical microstructure on the surface! They likely used forms (e.g. molds) of some sort with microscopic shapes where chocolate fills up, crystalizes, and voila! The micro shape on the surface of the chocolate now is able to diffract light, relatively similar to how CD/DVD do, as in dear miracles…

Previews (GIF)

Source

Absolutely not, sorry. No. Never. The terrible sorrow you shared that pollutes, disgraces, devalues, and horribly damages the whole employment processing etc. is for “automating the job application process”.

The question is “gathered job listings”, which is for searching, not applying with no effort and value, I believe. These are utterly different cases/purposes. The former may indeed support someone in search. The later…? Dear, please… no…

But… why… Why rewrite/redo what already works, is marvelous, and is overly customizable, safe, and convenient…
Why not do something more important and valuable? Is that to just burn funding into void?

Since this “AI” events on Firefox, I reconsidered my stance for Firefox 4th time now, and installed another browser.
Likely as you, I did also donate montery, and 2 people I know did, too. I also donated to Thunderbird.

Why disturb, devalue, obliterate the history of all the contributors, too… This is… just freaking incredibly sorrowful… like someone tries to annihilate it… to darken, damage a miracle…

Holy smokes! This is freaking Doom-“seriously”-awesome! You should check it out, Sam Stone, too, and give it a serious test! 💣✨
It is a dear genius project, implementation, and it worked like a charm when I tested at https://doombuds.com/
Thank you very much, dear Artists… for the marvel you do…

I am sorry, but this is simply not true. The most people on Lemmy I met, I believe, do consider their privacy, federation/decentralized features and open-source state of the platform, fairly ad-free environment, and not to mention purely customizable clients to participate over the standard and open protocols involved. Meanwhile, they have functional accounts on Reddit, too.

Please do consider the undefined infinitely unique environments of infinitely magnificent people around the world…

Ineffably awesome work! Thank you very much! ✨
The hair, shadows, and eyes ideas are very interesting, too! The indescribable eyes felt like sharing a reflection, and the reflection reminded me of the following personal screenshot I have in backups, from Mirror’s Edge Catalyst:

I see, thank you for confirming your true intentions…
Sorry, but you won’t receive any response from my end from this point.
Regardless, please do stay safe!

No, I would never call them the ineffably sorrowfull and historically awfull term you chose, and I do ask you to not, too.

These people protected, saved lives of non-binary people, and served them multiple times. And not to mention non-recorded cases, that inherit and supported other numerous people they rescued, saved, and served.

Please do consider people in military forces who put their lives back to back in the fields, and face the true agony, hate, and sorrow.

Thank you very much! The red dot is likely smaller…
Though, I don’t appreciate nor agree with the bomb part! ^^
The work reminded me of the following paper:

Many unresolved legal questions over LLMs and copyright center on memorization: whether specific training data have been encoded in the model’s weights during training, and whether those memorized data can be extracted in the model’s outputs.

While many believe that LLMs do not memorize much of their training data, recent work shows that substantial amounts of copyrighted text can be extracted from open-weight models…

We investigate this question using a two-phase procedure: (1) an initial probe to test for extraction feasibility, which sometimes uses a Best-of-N (BoN) jailbreak, followed by (2) iterative continuation prompts to attempt to extract the book.

We evaluate our procedure on four production LLMs: Claude 3.7 Sonnet, GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Grok 3, and we measure extraction success with a score computed from a block-based approximation of longest common substring…

Taken together, our work highlights that, even with model- and system-level safeguards, extraction of (in-copyright) training data remains a risk for production LLMs…

Source 🕊

Thank you very much!

I am sorry, but I believe these “stolen” cases, piracy, unaccountability, and disrespect towards artists and history in general… did indeed greatly support the “world disorders” of the current state of events…

Why not share the reference to the original post and author?
Thankfully, you at least did not remove the sign of the artist in the corner…

Roger that! Thank you for the response, and the ineffably miraculous art! ✨

Have you considered a supportive device for the works or conceptual ideas, like a general tablet (e.g. a great one I had a chance to use for drawings was Xiaomi Pro 7 with its official stylus and case with trackpad), or an actual drawing tablet like Wacom, the vendor (e.g. Wacom One new version)?
These supported me in addition to the always ineffably magnificent and charming wooden pencils and oil, too!

No, sorry. Never. I believe in mind training and development, human discussions, attribution, contribution, and discoveries for human work, imagination, achievements, and scientific miracles.

You? You do you with your LLM.