That’s the stretch goal, making it look like an accident is at 80 million.

If you visit the official website of krafton https://www.krafton.com/en/ you should get this pop up:

Basically, Krafton claims that the 3 founders they fired did not do their job in overseeing the project, leading to a game without any direction. Since the game would not meet their standards, they decided to rework a lot and push the release date back.

This is an official statement of a company, meaning they can be (and if I read it correctly have been) sued for slander should they lie here. So a legal department looked over this and decided “Yep, we can claim that they abandoned responsibilities, we can prove that in court”. Whether or not this is actually true or just an attempt to regain public opinion, it’s a real shitshow.

Thank you, comment that summarises what’s in the article, I was afraid I might have to read the article to get the full picture.

Zu welchem Zeitpunkt und wie genau es zur Verletzung kam - und ob der Beamte verletzt wurde oder sich selbst verletzt hat - bleibt unklar.

“Dass der Polizist rund 10 mal mit der rechten Hand auf Protestierende einschlägt, und erst danach die Hand schonend an die Brust hält, muss ja nichts heißen.”

Jo, ist dann nur blöd wenn man ne Kleinigkeit vom letzten Einkauf in der Tasche vergessen hat. Eventuell Stress mit der Kasse oder doppelt bezahlen, je nachdem, wem das und wem das nicht auffällt.

Gibt halt doch schon Hausregeln bei vielen Märkten dafür. Ich persönlich nehme meinen Rucksack ab und trage den halb offen in der Hand, wenn mir ein Korb zu viel Mühe machen würde, hatte damit nie Probleme. Zugegebenermaßen, ich pass nicht ins “Schema” und den Ladenbesitzer kennt man vom Dorffest, das machts natürlich einfacher.

This, too, is c/fuckcars.

I genuinely thought this was about chess for a second.

I like to think I’m critical, not hostile.

This article is about citizen group calling for a bike lane to be turned back into car lane. You know about induced demand yet? We here can’t stop telling people about it. Well, there is an inverse effect just a bit lower called “reduced demand” in the article. Removing a car lane can increase the flow of traffic down the line - provided there are viable alternatives to driving.

So yes, removing a bike lane to add another to cars is bad, even if it was a car lane before. Discouraging driving by removing car lanes is a good way to de-clog this bridge.

I can blame you for not reading correctly, yes.

And your aversion to public transport is exactly the point: Do you think maybe the buses are always late because a bridge like that has 50,000 cars bumper to bumper idling on it and blocking traffic? Do you think that there aren’t enough bus stops nearby because not enough people use the existing ones?

A single bus takes up 2 cars worth of space and transports 50 times the people. Having functional public transport is way better than adding another lane when the goal is to increase capacity of the bridge or reducing pollution. We should get more people to use them. It’s better for them too, since they are now not forced to drive and can check their phone or read books during that time.

No one wants the buses you are describing, but that’s exactly why we need to invest more in public transit and don’t listen to car advocates wanting “just one more lane™”. There are enough cities around the world with good transit options, where people want to take the bus or tram or bike, not because of “culture” but because they simply are the best option. And you won’t get there by adding another lane for cars.

P.S.: Do you also visit gay bars and get “censored” when there are no women there? No one’s forcing you to comment and not being open to learn is unwelcome here. Have you at least read the rules?

“desire paths” well and good, but who (above the age of 15) is jumping a hedge to save 3 second walk time? Must be next to a school.

This is a clear example of miscommunication.

Banning all cars from the bridge was not meant as a serious proposal, but just to show that these people do not care about pollution at all.

Meanwhile, you seem to have taken that proposal as serious and that it was calling to ban cars everywhere, instead of just one bridge. Banning cars everywhere is a fringe opinion even here, and I think no one ever suggested you have to “move stuff” with cargo bikes and public transport exclusively. On top of that, I personally don’t quite agree with the way you said public transport is “underdeveloped”. Yes there are specific addresses you can barely reach pretty much everywhere, but you comment reads as any specific address can’t be reached. I think we can expect people to walk a few hundred yards to a bus stop.

Wrong thing to say at the wrong place, do better next time.

I believe you are acting way too definitive about something rather unknowable.

For example, what is Aphantasia then?

I’m in the “inner monologue” camp. Most of what I think materialises as thought words. I don’t have to move anything in my throat to do that unlike OP though, I can think in words without mumbling to myself.

But I know the voice can’t be all. It’s difficult for me to think in words while actively saying something, but I can have new thoughts while speaking. Sometimes, I get interrupted in thinking mid-sentence, but then I return to that sentence to finish it because… it’s just satisfying? It’s not that I learn anything new.

I feel like I don’t have very much imagination any more. Its hard to produce images in my mind, not impossible but I do have to concentrate - remembering images is easier.

Weirdly, way harder to me: imagining a voice. Inner voice is what I sound like to myself, I can remember and replay songs and quotes as I heard them, but having any voice say anything is hard, especially female voices. Went through some examples in my head couldn’t make anyone say anything - until I thought to make different tf2 mercs sing “Oh Canada”, that somehow worked despite me definitely not having heard that before. Brains are weird.

I’ve seen this type of comment quite a lot here, and regardless of if you meant it that way I think it needs to be said for the benefit of all:

Bad road design does not excuse speeding.

Yes, changing the design is the more effective way to reduce the speed of traffic to a safe level. But just because the design was bad does not mean drivers can drive whatever feels right to them. The drivers still have a personal responsibility to drive safely, which in most cases means the same speed as the other vehicles, which means the speed limit bc that’s the only one everyone can agree on.

If the road design tempts you to sin, cut off your engine.

2015 wurde Deutschland Ziel eines Vertragsverletzungsverfahrens der EU Komission, weil Transportfahrer für ihre Zeit in Deutschland nach deutschem Mindestlohn bezahlt werden sollten. Die EU Komission sah darin einen potenziellen Eingriff in die Güter- und Dienstleistungsfreiheit, und meinte, dass die Fahrer in bestimmten Fällen nicht einmal Mindestlohn bekommen sollten, wenn nur Start- oder nur Endpunkt der Route in Deutschland liege.

Die Sache bei der Ich mir unsicherer bin ist wie das dann einvernehmlich gelöst wurde. Deutschland hatte damals die Verfolgung ausgesetzt, und es gab kritische Pressemitteilungen der EU zu dem Thema, Frankreich und Östereich erhieten ähnliche Verfahren, aber August 2024 wurde die Klage wegen neuer Gesetzteslage geschlossen.

Es sei denn, es geht um Transitfahrer; gegen die ist man durch die EU vertraglich verpflichtet zu diskriminieren.

This issue people have with some fixed phrases is bizarre to me.

Might as well say “Actually, this ‘morning’ isn’t ‘good’ at all!” and pretend you have a point. Really devalues anything following it by revealing the person saying it to be an obnoxious pedant.

But standing up for women’s rights this way get’s more retweets, which is the ultimate measure of success after all, so what do I know?