It’s also important that the UAE is also allegedly supporting crimes against humanity and genocide in China’s Xinjiang region. There is ample evidence for Beijing’s atrocities against Uyghurs as you may know (you’ll find a lot of very reliable sources across the web, some of them even here as I have read).

So Canada must not look only at Sudan but also China.

It is also important in this context that Chinese military was reportedly hosted at base in the UAE. The UAE and China have close military ties and held a joint air force drill in China’s Xinjiang region.

do we(legally) need to protest against each new version over and over again?

Not a legal expert, but I am afraid that’s how it is …

You may wish to write your MEP(s):

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/home

Aha …

Chinese robotaxi operator Pony.ai says one of its cars caught fire in Shanghai

Pony.ai Recalls Autonomous Driving Software After Crash in California

Europe needs to build that itself, as much as it needs to ‘re-industrialize.’ The safest and best place to produce things is in Europe as its environmental and social rules are more developed as elsewhere: https://feddit.uk/c/buyeuropean

Yeah, that’s certainly true. For Europe, however, the continent was rather regulating than building in the past. But it must do both. It’s also important to build a strong open source ecosystem in Europe imho. Relying on European Big Tech (Telecom, SAP, …) is insufficient. I am no sure whether all politicians have gotten this.

Addition: That’s basically what @emotional_soup_88@programming.dev says in this thread. I fully agree with that.

Yeah, China, India, and some oil states refuse to end fossil fuels, but ‘Europe bad’ despite it does the opposite …

Exactly. There is no option for Europe other than developing its own technology. https://feddit.uk/c/buyeuropean

Thank you for your respectful and sophisticated opinion.

A similar case recently happened in Germany, where the country’s authorities face heavy criticism after admitting that a 56-year-old Uyghur asylum-seeker was mistakenly put on a plane to China instead of to Turkey.

According to reports (one is here), the woman, Reziwanguli Baikeli, had fled China’s Xinjiang region in 2017, lived in Turkey for several years and joined her daughter in Germany in 2024. Uyghurs are recognised by Germany as a group at extreme risk of persecution; informal guidance says they should not be returned to China.

Experts call for Germany (and possibly the whole of Europe) for a federal “white list” of countries to which deportations are categorically barred, similar to policies already used in Sweden and the Netherlands.

A similar case recently happened in Germany, where the country’s authorities face heavy criticism after admitting that a 56-year-old Uyghur asylum-seeker was mistakenly put on a plane to China instead of to Turkey.

According to reports (one is here), the woman, Reziwanguli Baikeli, had fled China’s Xinjiang region in 2017, lived in Turkey for several years and joined her daughter in Germany in 2024. Uyghurs are recognised by Germany as a group at extreme risk of persecution; informal guidance says they should not be returned to China.

Experts call for Germany (and possibly the whole of Europe) for a federal “white list” of countries to which deportations are categorically barred, similar to policies already used in Sweden and the Netherlands.

Yeah, mainland China - the other China, so to say - shows a similar stance. Despite critical voices of Beijing regarding Israel’s war in Gaza, ties between China and Israel have in many ways proven resilient. Bilateral trade rose to USD 16.3 billion in 2024, up almost 12% from 2023, for example.

Despite Israel having banned Chinese suppliers from sensitive military procurement, commercial ties improved as trade data shows. In addition to U.S. companies, Chinese technology firms are a decisive supplier of Israel surveillance tech in Gaza and the West Bank (you’d easily find many reports on the web about that).

Didn’t you post a similar report today?

The pressure on car markets are not limited to the UK. China’s BYD literally warned of a ‘bloodbath’ in its Chinese domestic market, and we have been watching mass layoffs and bankruptcies in China, Europe, the U.S. in recent years.

‘PPC Land’ (pay-per-click ?) is publishing solely AI-generated content.

According to a new report, the problem is that the capacity to build EV batteries far outstrips demand globally.

• In North America, there is 1.9 times as much capacity as demand. In Europe, the capacity-to-demand ratio is 2.2.
• It’s worst in China with 5.6 times as much battery-building capacity as there is demand for batteries.
• Material and production costs are still high, which means EVs often aren’t cheaper than gas cars, reducing demand.

The pressure on car markets are not limited to the UK. China’s BYD literally warned a ‘bloodbath’ in its Chinese domestic market, and we have been watching mass layoffs and bankruptcies in China, Europe, the U.S. in recent years.

It will be solved in the long-term as the Nexperia crunch sees carmakers asking for ‘China-free’ supplies as I have read in this community.

I fully get the point of Ms. Kostyuchenko. It’s a big issue not easy to solve. I don’t see this as a “morally righteous punishment for the citizens of a state terrorizing the continent and making war in Ukraine,” though. No measure should ever be made to punish people, let alone as some form of ‘guilt by association’ what the linked report’s framing appears to suggest.

The EU’s move can also be seen as a necessary security measure. As a recent example: There is the case of Igor Rogov, a former employee of the Open Russia pro-democracy movement, which is banned in Russia as “undesirable.” Mr. Rogov has been living with his wife in Poland.

In the meantime, Mr. Rogov is in Polish detention and charged for spying for the Russian intelligence Federal Security Service (FSB).

The Moscow Times reports by citing Polish sources on Mr. Rogov’s testimony in court:

“I was supposed to do what I liked — climb the ranks of Russian oppositionists, meet new people and eventually report everything to the [Russian] Federal Security Service."

The Moscow Times also reports:

When the couple moved to Poland after the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Igor had told his wife [Irina] that he had been recruited by the FSB …

After Irina reportedly discovered her husband’s affair, she began revealing in private conversations with other Russian emigres that Igor had been cooperating for years with an FSB officer named Yevgeny.

Rogov allgedly also received a courier shipment containing components for a bomb, including liquid explosives, fuses and a power source.

If you look at OP’s post history you’ll see almost 2,000 posts in 5 months, and all of them fit into anti-European and anti-democratic, but pro-China propaganda.

Very often, bold headlines are not backed by the content as it is the case also here.

The reduction of Chinese overcapacity in sectors such as steel and electromobility are of great importance for the economy and jobs in Germany," Klingbeil said.

The very brief article also mentions that China’s influence in the Ukraine war will also be a topic of discussion.

The article only briefly mentions that German foreign minister postpones China trip amid rising tensions just a couple of weeks ago.

“We are postponing the journey to a later time,” the spokesperson told a regular news conference," [a spokesperson from Germany’s government said]. Wadephul has struck an increasingly tough stance on China since he took office as foreign minister in May, highlighting Beijing’s support for Russia’s war in Ukraine, its “increasingly aggressive behaviour” in the Indo-Pacific region, and its export curbs on rare earths and semiconductors.

In doing so, he has gone further still than his predecessor Annalena Baerbock, who was already known for being outspoken, labelling Chinese President Xi Jinping a “dictator”.

Mr. Wadephul has also maintained his support for Taiwan, stressing, for example, that Germany and Japan have common security interests in the Indo-Pacific region.

Of course, Germany and other Western states will attempt to get market access to China, although I personally feel this won’t happen anytime soon. German and other Western carmarkers are already beginning to diversify their supply chains away from China amid heightened security risks and the threat of further economic constraints as demonstrated by the recent conundrum over Nexperia. And similar moves of Western companies turning their back on China in its value chains are visible in other sectors as reports (also here on Lemmy as I’ve read) and data shows.

China has been protecting its domestic market even more since Xi Jinping took power. A meaningful access to Chinese markets for non-Chinese companies are not realistic in the near future imho (but I’d be happy if history proves me wrong). I personally think that Mr. Klingbeil knows that, too, but as a government official it’s absolutely fair that he is trying his best.

Many apparently don’t even read the paraphrased summary before engaging in whataboutism. Is this good?

I’d say it’s more Xi Jinping as European providers are also banned in China, no?