what worked for me teaching an undergrad course last year was to have

• in-class exams weigh 90% of the total grade, but let them drop their lowest score
• take-home work weigh 10% and be graded on completion (which i announced to the class, of course)
  • i was also diligent about posting solutions (sometimes before the due date — it’s a completion grade after all) and i let students know that if they wanted direct feedback they could bring their solutions to office hours

it ended up working pretty well. an added benefit was that my TAs didn’t have to deal with the nightmare of grading 120 very poorly written homeworks every four weeks. my students also stopped obsessing about the grades they would receive on their homeworks and instead focused on learning the grades they would receive on their exams

however, at the k-12 level, it feels like a much harder problem to tackle. parental involvement is the only solution i can think of, and that’s already kind of a nightmare (at least here in the us)

is the deniability you are referring to of the clanker-wankers (CW^[1]) themselves or the clanker-producers (e.g. sam altman)?

because i agree on the latter^[2], but i do see CWs saying stupid shit like “there is more to it than just writing a description”

edit: credit, it was @antifuchs who introduced the term to me here

edit2: sorry, my dumbass understands your point now (i think). if i wank clankers and someone tells me “that shit doesn’t work,” i can just respond “you must have been prompting it wrong”. but, i do think the way many users of these tools are so sycophantic means it’s also a genuine belief, and not just a way to escape responsibility. these people are fart sniffers, after all

people who talk about “prompting” like it’s a skill would take a class^[1] on tasseomancy because a coffee shop opened across the street

This is an excellent sneer, thank you for sharing! <3

Beads.

wish i had thought of this before clearing out my inbox 😞

hackneyed; stale

you seem like the kind of dork whose brain literally explodes when you read this sentence

clanker

edit: this may be used to refer to the chatbots themselves, rather than those who fondle chatbots

holy shit how have i never heard of this paper

thank you for sharing!

this is gonna live in my head forever without paying any rent and i am upset

is anyone else fucking sick and tired of discord? it’s one thing if it’s gaming-related^[1], but when i’m at a repo for some non-gaming project and they say “ask for help in our discord server”, i feel like i’m in a fever dream and i’m going to wake up and discover that the simulation i was in was managed by chatgpt

deleted by creator

ugh cybersecurity is already a fucking nightmare i should have braced myself

an unintended side effect of this is people who can’t or don’t want to verify their age going to less reputable sources. so even though it can be done in a “privacy-respecting fashion” (see, for example, soatok’s post on this^[1] ), it’s still a bad idea.

additionally, in my opinion no one who wants to enact such a thing is doing it in good faith. it is a pretense towards an ulterior goal^[2]

weird fuck’s post reads to me as the mistake of thinking web/js is uniquely capable of dynamic code loading

what is stopping a desktop or mobile client from running new/different code? the only solution im aware of (we’re in halting problem territory here, probably, though grapheneos has “prevent DCL from storage/memory” toggles so idk) is to inspect the code to make sure it does what they say and then cryptographically sign it

i made the stupid mistake of doing math, then cs

surrounded by

my narrow technical specialty + lack of experience or knowledge of other fields = i’m the smartest, here is a trivial solution to your problem

constantly

you can save even more time by not doing the work at all

the output is more consistent than what an LLM shits out, too

Edit: serious note, even though you probably aren’t worth anyone’s time: you may be conflating the technology’s actual use cases (as an accountability sink and to spread misinformation) with the intentions of its creators. and the real reason higher-ups are pushing this is because they’re pliant dipshits that would eat dogfood if the bowl was labelled “FOMO”. also they hate paying employees

it won’t eat oats

not sure why but this really ruins it for me

deleted by creator