Phenomephrene

deleted by creator

I move away from the mic to breathe in.

Nah, I’m not opposed to the proposition, and understandably any such tax law (if legislated with due consideration) should take into account cases where the effect may be otherwise than intended (or be amended with further subsequent legislation). Corporate squatting is a literal travesty.

I was just a bit baffled at the gall of supposing that the cost/benefit calculation of this kind of lifestyle choice could be up for second-hand proscription.

• Herbert Hoover
• List of Extinct Dog Breed
• United States Senate Elections 2026 in [State]
• A Woman Under the Influence
• Gengar

"Hey you know that activity that you enjoy, that makes the tedium and tests of life a bit more bearable? The one that provides a hub to maintain familial bonds, and adds another source of food that isn’t factory farmed or ultra-processed to your diet?

That isn’t how you’re supposed to spend your money, so stop it."

Not really fired up. Just injecting some food for thought. It’s healthy to be willing to bear some scrutiny toward certain under examined ideas/conventions.

I understand. I just saw an opportunity to highlight what I see often go as unquestioned convention that really deserve to be questioned a bit more.

Edit - correcting text-swipe error

The picture humorous because we live with socially conditioned beauty standards that dictate that female identifying humans who don’t rid themselves of naturally occurring body hair are to be considered unattractive and/or subversive.

Haha!