You’re using the old definition of AI.

Machine learning is what used to be called AI, before they figured out that it wasn’t.

Now LLMs are AI, even though they’re not.

Machine learning and neural nets are fine, the current “AI” pushed on everything everywhere, is not fine.

I’d say there’s more heroism than being brave or inspirational, but eh. This conversation is clearly going nowhere — have a great weekend.

I don’t know of any heroic deeds that Hitler did.

Do you?

Edit: also, you may have me confused with a different user. I didn’t say he was a hero, that was dagwoodiii a bit upthread, and I suspect he was just copy/pasting some other reference, not his personal moral evaluation of the life of John Paul Jones.

He’s not my personal hero at all, never heard of the dude.

Just saying that a horrible piece of shit can still do heroic things, even if awful deeds outshine them. I’d say that those heroic deeds by definition makes them a hero, even if it’s only in a narrow context as “American naval warfare”.

Both things can be true. Heroes are not always (maybe rarely) good people. Especially so for war heroes.

See also “corn” (maize)

The adults in the state were not the ones affected in this instance. Unfortunately.

Ah yes, all the 9-year-old girls who voted for Trump…

I dunno man. It’s no Northgate Omnikey.

Saving the clicks: there are no big surprises.

There is nothing surprising about Albanese’s choices

The author is “surprised-but-not-really” that an old white Australian dude doesn’t listen to indigenous music.

The war exists because Russia invaded. You can’t have a “peace agenda” or “conditions for peace” until someone started a war in the first place, and that was Russia.

US only instigated this war to weaken Russia

Well, that’s certainly a perspective.

Really unclear how the US forced Russia to invade, you’ll have to explain that part I think.