Too often there is this separation we invent where misogyny is a ubiquitous tool of patriarchy while misandry is somehow separate. This becomes so intense that many are not even able to admit that misandry is even theoretically possible, and even if it’s undeniable it is still seen as highly irrelevant to patriarchy.

But misandry does advance patriarchy and it is a force that intensifies misogyny.

Consider homophobia. This is an obvious case where misandry advances heretopatriarchy. Certain men can entrench their status through an infrastructure of hatred against homosexual men that can be accessed by nearly everyone else as well.

Consider transphobia. Another obvious realm where misandry is at play. Trans men are shown hatred in ways that are unique to the experience of cis men, and these experiences drive cis heteronormativity.

Consider how our actions and ideas impact the world. If we live in denial of misandry we live in denial of patriarchy. Denying misandry does not make you a quality feminist. It does not make you theoretically sound. Hating men just gets in the way of challenging patriarchy.

Consider how misandry enforces gender roles. Misandrous discourse functions to discipline people. When misandry is denied, there is almost always an element of “you have to man up, because women are weak.” The narrative is familiar; women are subjected to patriarchal violence and are thus too hysterical to have sound or reasonable options about men, thus, men must internalize misandrous attitudes out of sheer emotional intelligence and masculine willpower. The men who fail to do this are weak, unable to maintain a rational, stoic attitude and are thus lesser, unmasculine men. Men who can master their performance of masculinity in a self-denying or sacrificial way will benefits from misandry but will certainly be thoroughly disciplined by it.

Women, other non men genders,and queer communities often play a role in policing masculinity for patriarchy which may obfuscate the patriarchal power at play. This ultimately reinforces misogyny by haphazardly enforcing binaries, devaluing feminity, and promoting a supremacist view of masculinity.

Let me paint a situation. Imagine a comedian making a joke about their trans wife; that she removed the worst part of her–being a man. Everyone laughs in support of trans women and implicitly they laugh AT trans men and cis men. Next joke is about how stupid bisexual women are for dating men, how they make the queer community worse.

Now imagine you are a man who wants a little clarity in life. How should you feel about such language which is clearly both misandrous and misogynistic? How should you feel that it is directed at you, as a man? I’ll tell you:

You should feel safe because you are a man. If you don’t feel safe it’s because you are a weak man, incapable of performing.

  • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    you are again bringing up morality when i am talking about class issue.

    This isn’t going to work. I am the one here who’s introduced class into this moralistic discussion. Me.

    you seem to be fixated on this idea that men are ontologically evil.

    Which, again, has been my point in this entire thread. It’s all there for anyone to see. Changing your tune now and trying to swap places with me isn’t going to work. Otherwise you’re just agreeing with me while trying to appear not to.

    again, nobody said that

    Do I have to tap the link again? “I don’t and can’t blame feminists who are more confrontational. I know what their feeling and I get it. [The onus is on men to start listening…](I don’t and can’t blame feminists who are more confrontational. I know what their feeling and I get it. The onus is on men to start listening)”

    yes!

    Yes, you agree with my correction of your take. Good.

    do you really think that only in the US men are a privileged class? because it doesnt seem that you even think that to start with

    No, I just assumed, completely without evidence that you were American based on the western centered worldview that there is only one society, and men are privileged within it.

    i do not deny that! but class is not absolute, it is an aggregate concept. some proletarians being more privileged than some bourgeois

    Great. The important distinction where this analogy breaks down is that peoples’ relations to the means of production can be changed easily. And this is something we aim to achieve. Whereas men can’t ever stop being men.

    • star (she)@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, I just assumed, completely without evidence that you were American based on the western centered worldview that there is only one society, and men are privileged within it.

      Lol you have no idea about me. I’m kind of done with this conversation