• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Honestly quite the downgrade in some departments imo. You cant swap the battery without a screwdriver anymore (was great for hiking with a secondary battery) and no USB3 which also means no DP over USBC.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Actually to me that’s an improvement as my back plate, and thus my battery, has come loose causing the phone to sometimes turn off when it falls.

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            I was reading that actually this change helped make the phone thinner and lighter, and they used a softer battery instead of the old one with a hard shell, so it was definitely a compromise.

  • rollerbang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Now if only they’d support Graphene OS or something like that. Preferably signed, so that banking apps would have a chance of working.

    In the long run bonus - Linux support would be nice too.

    • Ryan.ee@infosec.exchange
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      @rollerbang @ryanee@anonsys.net CalyxOS/LineageOS/postmarketOS/UBTouch and/or /e/OS would be better for trying to get banking support, they are compatible with plenty more devices including Google Pixel while GrapheneOS is only compatible with Google Pixel

      • rollerbang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Sure, but I’m trying to see it from a manufacturer’s perspective. They’ve got to put effort in an OS regardless, so maybe it wouldn’t be too much extra effort, if any, to have Grapehene supported.

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          It would require an entire separate TPM chip, integration of it on the main PCB, and all the the firmware and software handling that comes with that, and collaboration with the GrapheneOS team (which I hear on forums and people who have worked with them, is often not a pleasant experience) for an extremely small percentage of their sales.

          Doing /e/ or calyx would definitely be significantly easier.