• Hobo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Both are past 100k now! I want to issue a special “fuck you” to all the idiot streamers that tried to kill SKG. And of course a special “go fuck yourself” to PirateSoftware and Asmongold for being fuckwit right wing tools for corporations. You have a special place in my heart as illiterate lapdogs to shitty corporations and right wing shills.

    • lowleekun@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Asmonpoop is a moronic bum and people went from “this weirdo is strangely entertaining” to " let me hear what my moronic hobo-idol has to say about this".

      It is a little bit like how people supported Drumpf as a joke first.

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Still in disbelief people think SKG is going to work. The premise fucking genocides the MMORPG genre. You kill games by implementing this horrible understanding of how games work.

          I have never seen more people support games who have no fucking idea how games work and it’s the most frustrating shit ever. Pirate Software is right. It’s not even a debate.

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            It doesn’t.

            It just requires that you provide a verson people can host themselves if you take your game offline.

            • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              And if a company refuses? They’re dead anyway. This is not well thought out and PS called it out. You have no actionable solution but are calling for one to just appear.

              • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                If they refuse to make a totally reasonable addition to their game then yeah they can’t publish it wow what a concept.

    • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I don’t like Asmon but my understanding is he supports SKG. Am I wrong?

      Also I saw a clip of SomeOrdinaryGamers, which indicated that he tempered his support with a dash of (wrong) both-sides-ism. But it was only a clip.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I know about PirateDouchebag, but I am not aware of Asmongold’s issue.

      I apologize but, let’s say that I’ve living under a rock

      • Hobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Asmongold is a megaphone for shitty opinions. Like I posted elsewhere he’ll change his opinion if he gets called out, but the damage was done when he put it on the megaphone in the first place. His take on the “never play defense” is to not have any actual opinions when confronted then just go right back to saying other right wing bullshit.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      They tried to kill it? Really? Like, “we must stop this from going forward!” In that way? Why would anyone attempt to stop it?

      I still think this is going to fail. But I’m not trying to stop it. I hope it succeeds.

      I also find the debate bros involved to be annoying.

      • Hobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Yep they actively campaigned against the petition and fundamentally misrepresented it.

        10 months ago PirateSoftware started a campaign against it starting here-ish: https://youtu.be/ioqSvLqB46Y

        Also 10 months Asmongold did a react video that supported PirateSoftware: https://youtu.be/AhVsyhjcndw

        PirateSoftware refused to acknowledge that he got several things wrong, and even refused to acknowledge it when confronted. He actively bans people with dissenting opinions in his stream so it wasn’t surprising that he refused to acknowledge that he was wrong. About a week ago Charlie (aka Penguinz0) confronted him about it and he still refused respond to basic factual inaccuracies: https://youtu.be/6sJpTCitKqw

        Ross did a video talking about the whole thing last week as well: https://youtu.be/HIfRLujXtUo

        There’s a lot more to it, but that’s the broad strokes. I hope PirateSoftware’s stream keeps declining until he is relegated to complete obscurity. Also, PirateSoftware can eat my entire ass.

  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I can’t wait for this to effectively do nothing oe alternatively kill games that have an online only capability that refuse to devote work to force a single player model/release their netcode.

    This is the stupidest, well intentioned movement I’ve seen in awhile and the fervor behind it is a waste. You know what you want but refuse to understand why it can’t happen. You chase the past not realizing you can never go back.

    This is most republican shit I’ve ever seen. “Make games great again!” Jesus.

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      No need to be so salty. Maybe instead just read what skg really is about because you obviously have misunderstood it completely.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        People are sitting on PS for giving a completely correct take. I’ve read SKG and even listened to what the petition owners have said. I’ve stayed in the loop which is why it’s so frustrating to watch people with noble intentions cannibalize people for telling you it’s not only misguided but impossible.

        Legislation will not compel a dying company to release code that will let any random person breathe life back into it on their own whim. Period.

        • Asetru@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Legislation will not compel a dying company to release code

          Well I guess then it’s a good thing that the petition doesn’t demand that.

          • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Upon reading the UK version over again you’re right - it’s even worse. It states that companies no longer be allowed to ‘disable’ games which they often don’t do. They just stop maintaining them until the infrastructure for it disappears.

            I expected at the very least gamers would have understood the problem they’re complaining about but I got ahead of myself. The only thing SKG might accomplish legally is to allow third parties to host servers at End of Life but the counter argument to that is cheaters using their own servers.

            None of this is thought out. You’re demanding a solution be created AND implemented. This will go nowhere. Pirate Software was right and it’s stunning.

            • Asetru@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Upon reading the UK version over again you’re right

              :)

              it’s even worse.

              sigh

              Why?

              It states that companies no longer be allowed to ‘disable’ games which they often don’t do. They just stop maintaining them until the infrastructure for it disappears.

              You’re close. Maybe read it again. Or something. I don’t know.

              • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Maybe instead of being the condescending dickhead you and yours project onto Pirate Software, you could instead point out specifics since you’re advocating for it. I’m confident you can’t though since I’m sure you haven’t read shit, just listened to people slobber all over it.

                • Asetru@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Maybe we wouldn’t have to be such condescending dickheads if you cared to not make up stuff.

                  the initiative seeks to prevent the remote disabling of videogames by the publishers, before providing reasonable means to continue functioning of said videogames without the involvement from the side of the publisher.

                  That’s the core idea. Publishers should just make sure that after they milked their product it can somehow be run without their interference.

                  That doesn’t require sources. In fact, this doesn’t even state any method that is preferred. Could they release sources? Sure. They could also release server binaries. They could also patch out the connection to their servers and only leave people with local multiplayer mode or something. They could do whatever. The initiative doesn’t care.

                  The practice of licensing a product indefinitely but then just disabling it remotely is hostile to consumers. If they really, really want to keep their business model, they should sell licenses that are limited to a certain timeframe right from the start. Selling perpetual licenses and then disabling them without leaving consumers with any means to still access what they paid for shouldn’t be legal and probably isn’t.

                  Also this right here:

                  The initiative does not seek to acquire ownership of said videogames, associated intellectual rights or monetization rights, neither does it expect the publisher to provide resources for the said videogame once they discontinue it while leaving it in a reasonably functional (playable) state.

                  Nobody wants your ip. Just don’t break stuff you sold.