Previously:

  • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Of all the things he’s changed about the country, I bet something like this is what he cares about the most. I can just imagine the tantrum trump will throw when the next president* digs this up and returns it to grass, or better yet, an actual garden.

    * if we get another president.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oh they are all petty twits.

      Regan pitched a fit and removed the solar panels Carter left on the roof when he left office. This is just more proof the regressive party has no taste.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      If there ever will be a next US president I expect him to first tear down that new gold wing, then to dig up this shit.

      Anything else can wait

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    Honestly, I’m amazed he managed to restrain himself from making it mostly gold. Can’t imagine that this ballroom will have such restraint.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hows drainage?

    Also they kept the much cheaper pavers around it, which looks stupid as hell.

  • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Am I missing something here? It looks like the roses are still there and he just paved over the big useless lawn.

    Anyone else see this? Those rose bushes are still clearly there on the right side of the image. Ifball were talking about is the replacement of some shit grass anyways, who gives a fuck?

      • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        So does a fucking lawn. Actually, imo, lawns are worse. It’s a perfect representation of the toxicity of the “American dream”. It’s an unnatural landscape that’s inhospitable to life, sort of like the concrete, costs resources to maintain, unlike the concrete, but it gets some weird psychological pass because it’s green. It’s shit either way.

        Talking about “he ripped out the rose garden” is just more sensationalism horseshit when the roses are right there, just fuckin dandy. He tore out a lawn that was equally as shit.

        • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Ow wee… Your opinion isn’t going to be well received. He’s clearly making the white house tacky and gross like he’s tacky and gross. It’s going to take so long to get his skid marks and farts out of the white house. So much industrial cleaner. Just like the US is going to need some industrial cleaner to get rid of the fascists.

        • nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          If we’re talking ChemLawn, I’ll agree with you. But mulch mowing the yard is IMO categorically better than paving (or ChemLawning)

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      Lawns are bad, yes, replacing lawn with hard impermeable surface, worse.

      It’s as if someone turned their whole front yard in to a parking lot.

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Grass looked greener than a par 4, and many people give a fuck. Did you want one?

      • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        A lawn? Absolutely not. It’s a resource sink for no other reason that vanity. If they weren’t going to put in something useful, like clover or any actual productive plant life, then I’d rather see it capped off and no longer watered. Golf courses too for that matter. Pave them over entirely and build dense urban housing instead on a national scale.

        • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          There are many reasons for a lawn and cement or tiles is much more pompous, but you sound like you just want attention.

    • quid_pro_joe@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah that grass square always seemed strange to me even as a kid, since they hosted outdoor parties for visiting foreign dignitaries and grass isn’t the best surface for fancy shoes, especially women’s heels. My brothers and I would sometimes wonder if it opened up to reveal a secret missile base or Aurora landing pad.

    • Elaine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Agreed, the whole clutching of pearls over the rose garden is ridiculous. It’s widely accepted that lawns are an unnecessary flex. This area is used for seating so nothing but some grass that was probably in need of constant repair because of all the traffic. This is a big nothing sandwich.

  • Kirp123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    374
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s a good representation of this new regime. Tear down nature and replace it with a parking lot.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      8 days ago

      It also looks like something you’d find at a cheap, trashy resort where children poop in the pool.

        • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          111
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Stone isn’t nature? Looks like natural stone to me. It’s ugly AF but both are artifical and have little to do with nature.

          Edit: it’s just a joke guys, don’t take it too seriously lol

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          8 days ago

          It doesn’t require constant watering and fertilizer that leeches into ground water just so you can have perfectly green 2" tall grass fully exposed to the sun that doesn’t want to live there and call it “nature”.

          • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            61
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            If you’re going to get nitpicky we could focus on how much heat the concrete retains vs plant life which can absorb and use the energy. All the people with concrete or rock yards around here are super hot, my dog and I have to run by in the summer. Paving vast surfaces is a poor alternative to landscaping. The soil underneath will dry and the animals, insects, microflora, etc will all be forced out and that part of the earth will just be dead.

            But really it just looks dumb and Jackie planted some of those trees.

          • Riskable@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            If you mow your lawn with an electric lawn mower that’s charged via solar panels, your lawn is a carbon sink (assuming you water it via some renewable means).

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah, for this space that is frequently used to host people or filled with chairs for a press conference, it is better and makes more sense.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 days ago

            The problem is, have you ever noticed how much hotter you are in a parking lot on a warm day than when you are in a park? Well, now those events are happening on a parking lot and not a park. Furniture can be designed to work on turf, or temporary fixtures could be put in place to mitigate the drawbacks of furniture on lawns, but the absorbed and reflected heat will be hard to get rid of. Hopefully this area is small enough to not have a big impact on the temperature there.

            I honestly don’t think it looks bad, but I suspect it’s more for Trump to put his stamp on it than anything else, and to erase the efforts of others before him. And I suspect it will be more uncomfortable than it was before.

          • sthetic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            8 days ago

            I agree. I hate Trump as much as anyone else, but if a President I liked did this, it wouldn’t be the end of the world.

            In principle, I don’t mind if a space mainly used for events, with chairs placed there often, should be hardscape. It’s not as if lawn can’t be put back there in the future. Lawn isn’t a heritage tree or rose shrub.

            To be fair though, the photo makes it look pretty huge as an expanse of paved area.

            • skisnow@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yeah, it’s not that he did it per se, it’s the idea that he probably did it because he’s a classless fat troll.

              Same with some of his policies; grand scheme of things if they were presented by most other people I’d have little objection, but because they’re motivated by greed, hate or narcissism I don’t want to give the twat an inch.

      • Jack@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        A good representation of the old regimen, as unnatural as concrete, but at least trying to appear natural