NomNom@feddit.ukBanned to politics @lemmy.world · edit-21 month agoKansas lawmakers set to vote on a bill that would shield pesticide companies from cancer lawsuitswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up144arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world
arrow-up144arrow-down1external-linkKansas lawmakers set to vote on a bill that would shield pesticide companies from cancer lawsuitswww.reuters.comNomNom@feddit.ukBanned to politics @lemmy.world · edit-21 month agomessage-square4linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world
minus-squareTyphoon@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoThere won’t be verdicts against them if the law says you can’t file a suit.
minus-squareAmidFuror@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoRight. I was only addressing your statement that making safe products protects from lawsuits. That’s not true. If Roundup caused no increase in cancer rates, it would not mean Bayer could not be sued - and lose - in court.
There won’t be verdicts against them if the law says you can’t file a suit.
Right. I was only addressing your statement that making safe products protects from lawsuits. That’s not true. If Roundup caused no increase in cancer rates, it would not mean Bayer could not be sued - and lose - in court.