200fifty@awful.systems to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · edit-222 days agoAgainst truthsamkriss.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up125arrow-down11
arrow-up124arrow-down1external-linkAgainst truthsamkriss.substack.com200fifty@awful.systems to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · edit-222 days agomessage-square20linkfedilink
minus-squarezogwarg@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·21 days agoFunnily enough it isn’t even required by their purported bayesian doctrine (which proves none of them do the math), you could simply “update forward” again based on the new evidence that the text is part-fictional.
Funnily enough it isn’t even required by their purported bayesian doctrine (which proves none of them do the math), you could simply “update forward” again based on the new evidence that the text is part-fictional.