• MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    So, socio/psychopathy. You know, what capitalism extols as a virtue, rewards and what the hellscapes create.

      • Paragone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        While it is true that the cultures we are born into usually are selectively-sociopathic, not all remain with that process/engineered-evolution.

        & I’ve experienced bodhichitta, itself: so any claim that “everyone suspends their empathy” cannot apply to anyone who is permanently in bodhichitta: it’s mutually-exclusive with suspending-empathy.

        More-objective empathy makes one more & more incompatible with the cultures of this world, though: that is absolutely true.

        One is “insane” according to the comparatively-sociopathic cultures that rule.

        Exactly as Confucian Marxist Leninist culture in China deems spirituality insanity, & holds that it ought be subjected to psychiatric-treatment.

        & … to me, sociopathy is a spectrum, not a binary off/on toggle: most of the cultures of this world are somewhat sociopathic.

        ( I’m using “sociopathic” for induced-non-empathy, vs psychopathic for intrinsically-incapable-of-empathy )

        Moneyarchy & concentration-of-wealth-archy absolutely do value DarkTriad-nature for dominance & supremacism.

        The reason they’re successful is because narcissism is normal in humankind, & therefore the “soil is rich” for that development, among our species…

        which was actually my reason for opening this discussion to add:

        https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/people-of-the-lie-m-scott-peck/1100181526?ean=9780684848594

        identifies that the root of evil seems to be narcissism.

        This guy, above, identifies it as non-empathy.

        They seem to be 2 sides of the same coin, though:

        if one has honest empathy for others, then that undermines narcissism.

        If one hasn’t empathy, then narcissism hasn’t got anything competing against it, in one’s sentience.

        & that, itself, seems to be a bad problem.

        I believe that the whole “it’s narcissism 1st” vs “it’s non-empathy 1st” is idiotic: chicken vs chicken-egg, argument…

        They’re co-evolving, aren’t they?

        _ /\ _