• James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    26 days ago

    I have to assume the people who think Star Trek is woke now also believe drag queens in the 90s represented good christian values

      • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        26 days ago

        I’ve seen the word “professionalism” come up in a lot of people’s complaints about nuTrek, but that concept of professional behaviour is something I just don’t value. If the people you’re working with stop respecting you because you choose to sit comfortably or let out an exuberant “fuck yeah!” when things go great, I think you’re working with the wrong people. I think only unserious and immature people would worry about that.

        I’m also one of those who embraces the “scientists” view of Starfleet over the “military” view, so that might be a factor. I like to see the crew comfortable at their jobs and loving what they do.

        So all of that is to say I’m 110% down with Holly Hunter letting her piggies out, and I don’t think that reflects badly on her or her gender in the least.

        • James R Kirk@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          The word “professionalism” here a common dogwhistle for “obedience” and “conformity”. It’s use in this context is almost exclusively directed towards women, but also sometimes to black men.

          When Micheal Burhnam disobeys orders it’s “unprofessional”, when Worf or Picard does it, it’s “bold”. When Ake sits down unconventionally it’s “unprofessional”, when Riker does it, it’s a quirky and beloved part of his character. etc. etc.

          • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            25 days ago

            Yeah I’d say you hit the nail on the head. In a franchise that thought Spock saying his superiors should “go to hell” was such a great line they had Data ape it two films later, “professional” seems to be a label some characters have easier access to than others.

          • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            26 days ago

            If I based my esteem for things on how popular they are, I’d have never gotten into Star Trek. It was decidedly unpopular with my cohort at the time.

            For what it’s worth I adore old school Trek. Just like I think it would be dumb to judge someone for being comfy or exuberant, I also wouldn’t judge someone for preferring a reserved demeanour like dear old Picard.

            I also remember Geordi building model ships in engineering and running off to play with Data on the holodeck, so I don’t really see an incompatibility between the eras.

            I mean, look at this scene. Is it really that far off from Tilly dropping her enthusiastic F bombs?

            https://youtu.be/Lr64khTqyYQ

                  • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    23 days ago

                    EDIT: I apologize. This was a bit snarkier in tone than I intended, and probably escalated conversations in ways that I shouldn’t have. A more civil way to put it is I disagree on the standard of “seriousness” ascribed to the earlier Star Trek series; take the Riker maeuver, for instance.

                    Ah, yes, Star Trek, the “dead serious” show.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        Well said. The unprofessional behavior is a significant contributor to turning me off nutrek. Why the hell do the engineering and science departments in discovery behave like 20 year olds in need of therapy? How the fuck did these people pass starfleet academy at all?

          • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 days ago

            Another one who wasn’t actually paying attention to the scenario or the dialogue while criticizing the show for being ‘dumbed down’ for younger audiences.

            I admit I’m losing patience.

            Dudes!!! This takes place when the Academy is being recreated after Starfleet and the Federation were seen to have failed large portion of the galaxy after the Burn.

            This means that this class DID NOT complete with the best and the brightest across a well connected Federation with a common base of expectations.

            They passed the entrance exams but it was not the same as a stable 24th century scenario, or even the early 25th century where Picard’s son was fast tracked based on experience.

            Some, like Genesis, are from multi generational Starfleet families that hung on in secret bases during a century of anarch.

            Most of the rest are off their planets or out of their small cluster of planets for the first time in their or their parents’ lives.

            Others are the first of their species to enter Starfleet and are there for political reasons.

          • sirblastalot@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            I think it’s fine if they act like highschoolers in a show for highschoolers. It just means that’s not a show that’s for me.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            Sadly i am a little older than that, the therapy part is accurate though.

            I am however not a highly trained, best of the best, sci fi astronaut academy graduate charged with overseeing a critical element of a colossal machine designed to violate the laws of physics; so why does that matter?

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        26 days ago

        I have a friend with autism who has trouble wearing shoes, and faces social judgement for it. To Me, Chancellor Ake is representation. SFA is woke.

      • James R Kirk@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        26 days ago

        lmao why do you care about “bad looks”? are you doing PR for chancellor ake? who the hell cares. I cannot express how weird it is to me that you care about that. Honestly I’m completely baffled as to why you care about how a fictional character who wouldn’t care about your option if she was real, but can’t care about your opinion because she’s not, presents herself.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      also believe drag queens in the 90s represented good christian values

      I have no horse in the race, but an argument could be made about there being multiple types of drag, especially in the UK where it’s traditional to make fun of matriarchal figures by doing drag at panto for christmas.

      now if the dudes doing that are doing it to get off, who knows, but it’s not all Drag Race queens and LGBT people doing it. (not that there’s anything wrong with that)… also that shit existed back then too.