• Typhoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    3 days ago

    You’re missing the other countries he’s used fentanyl to harass: Mexico, Canada, and China.

    • just2look@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      At least those countries are at least associated with fenntanyl and its supply chain. Venezuela is not as far as I’m aware. So it makes the whole thing much more preposterous.

      And just to clarify, we should not be starting any wars over the drug trade since that is much more effectively combatted by dealing with the causes here at home. As long as there is demand there will always be supply.

      • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re assuming he’s talking about using this as an excuse to invade Venezuela. I’m assuming he’ll use it as an excuse to invade Canada and Mexico. He’s already made up bullshit about how it’s pouring over our border, and he’s already threatened our country with annexation.

        • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          If they invade it, the US won’t attempt to annex Mexico because giving Mexicans US citizenship will piss off Trump’s racist supporters.

        • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          There’s no way that happens. The oligarchs would lose money in the conflict. They gain money in a Venezuela conflict presumably. They have a lot of oil, like almost Saudi levels of oil, and there isnt enough trade with Venezuela for a war to upset the pocket books of the wealthy.

          • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m sure the US could feel entitled to Canadian oil too, and then make up a justification afterwards.

            • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yes, I agree in principle. However, the economics (well, monied interests) of it right now are not favorable. Too many people with money to make in US-Canadian trade would pull support for the politicians that push for it. That may change over time.

              I think the idea was floated in the media by Mr Asshat because someone wanting the oil was interested in capturing it, but the push back from other donors was clear, and we dont hear them talking about it anymore other than to defend their “right” to float such ideas.

              • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Your points are correct. There was also congressional vote condemning tariffs on Canada.

        • just2look@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m not saying Canada has a significant role. Venezuela just isn’t involved at all.

          “Based on seizure data and law enforcement investigation information, the consensus among U.S. authorities is that Mexico was the only significant source of illicit fentanyl and fentanyl analogues trafficked into the United States in 2024.”

          Source

          Venezuela isn’t even mentioned. Neither is Canada I suppose. And that is U.S. gov data. So not like they can claim they didn’t know.