• Geodad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    If scientists didn’t have to pay obscene prices to view articles, those articles are cited more often. Who would have thought?

  • Mavvik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I personally like scihub because it’s easier to get papers off of rather than going through my library’s portal for a lot of journals.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Noted. Will upload my future papers on SciHub myself. /j. Or am I? Vsauce music plays Did you know vegetables are a social construct?

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Dunno what Sci-Hub is, but most researchers are happy to send you a copy of their paper on request - and this is completely legal. Their email address is usually on the abstract.

  • x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Isn’t it odd that researchers who should be pros at caring about and finding the most correct metrics for every topic are obsessed with a proxy for quality that is just about the most disjoint possible? It should be embarrassing.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Unfortunately, it’s commonly not researchers that create academic circles, it is publishers and other entities with vested interest in making us publish more garbage.

      Scientific world is corrupt as hell.