return2ozma@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 months agoProletariat shopping time...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up1476arrow-down111
arrow-up1465arrow-down1imageProletariat shopping time...lemmy.worldreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square42linkfedilink
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down4·2 months agoOh yeah, they tried this in China in the 50s. It went great.
minus-squaresomethingsnappy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·2 months agoIt would be stupid and terrible either way, but that was a government takeover.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·edit-22 months ago but that was a government takeover. How else do you imagine a large-scale infrastructure would happen? an angry mob?
minus-squaresomethingsnappy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months agoDid you read the post?
minus-squareDagwoodIII@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoIt was something they could do a few times. It makes a nice story, but doesn’t mean there was any significant change.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThe post is not a description of large-scale infrastructure takeover. That was literally the point of this comment thread.
Oh yeah, they tried this in China in the 50s. It went great.
It would be stupid and terrible either way, but that was a government takeover.
How else do you imagine a large-scale infrastructure would happen? an angry mob?
Did you read the post?
It was something they could do a few times. It makes a nice story, but doesn’t mean there was any significant change.
The post is not a description of large-scale infrastructure takeover. That was literally the point of this comment thread.