• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Here’s Debt: The First 5000 Years by David Graeber, I believe this is what you’re referencing. Capital isn’t too difficult, IMO. It’s long, but the first 3 chapters are the most complex, after that it’s fairly smooth sailing, and Marx is actually a pretty witty writer. Just in case anyone was too scared by its reputation to read it!

    • primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      It’s not that its hard, but Marx–while capable of very good and engaging writing–was trying to be a respectable 19th century intellectual for that one, so it’s kind of a painfully dry slog. That was the style at the time.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’d actually say that applies more to volume 2 than it does 1. 1 has lots of literary references, metaphors, and fiery writing, while volume 2 is far more straight and academic. Lenin on the other hand was always spicy with his writing, haha.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Can’t agree with Lenin slander, he’s one of the greatest heroes the working class has ever had and one of the greatest theoreticians of all time. That being said, at least we can agree that he was a hell of a writer!