And I thought Americans were carbrained, holy shit.

(To be fair, he’s not wrong in that this is intended to keep the auto companies and the government nice and fat – but the obvious response to this is to agitate for better public transit, not railing against an environmentally sound policy.)

The article in question.

  • Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sadly 1km is not the dumbest distant i have seen

    Back when I walked my kids to school a parent who shared a fence with the school would drive them around a piece of grass the the front of the school and drop them of. The path through the grass was along side their side garden wall and shorter than the road they drove.

    Of course it was a huge 4x4 to boot

        • frunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I always thought the equipment should all be hooked up to some sort of generator somehow so that the place could turn all that energy being spent exercising into electricity for the lights etc. There could also be pancakes 🥞

          • Cypher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Human exercise produces so little electricity that it would probably be a net negative to produce everything required for this gimmick.

      • lost@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve been to Mumbai, and 1km is fine for us Europeans, but depending on their location, it can be a life-threatening experience due to the intense traffic, pollution and heat.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Unfortunately fuel being burned in other countries is still heating up their environment.

            Also idk if you’ve heard, but India isn’t exactly a rich place. A lot of people can’t afford EVs. Despite the fact that yes, the Indian market has cheap options available. But my man in the tweet has been nursing a Hyundai i10 for 15 years. He ain’t exactly trying to spend money on cars.

            The entire policy is designed to hurt poor people that are car dependent (if you look at the photo of the street in his other tweet, you’ll see why he isn’t walking the 1 kilometer. There’s no sidewalk).

            If the government also gave him a good public transit option with AC, the fuel ban could easily be justified. As it is now, rich people will buy newer cars and poor people will be criminals, or take on debt they can’t afford to get buy newer cars.