If any of you lovely shitposters have the same for instagram and tik tok my homies in discord¹ will be very pleased

¹ Yes I try to bring them into Matrix or Lemmy but it is not that easy

  • jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hey, we are an anarchist instance, not "anarcho"capitalist. (Look at db0’s blog, he might be an ai shill but he’s not an ancap)

    • ipitco
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      So you’re at the bottom 🤔, but where on the horizontal axis is to be guessed

          • jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean… can you really call it anarchism if you have a n implicit hierarchy? I would say that defeats the point.

            • ipitco
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Income inequalities don’t implicitly imply a hierarchy in terms of authority over other people

              Anarchism mainly rejects the state’s hierarchy. It doesn’t make it left or right

              Also knowing that left and right will often rely on the state to push their ideas and rules

              • jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Anarchism in it’s correct interpretation rejects all hierarchies, be it from the state, white supremacy, the patriarchy or capitalism. Since money is equivalent to power income inequality does inherently imply a hierarchy.

                • ipitco
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The wikipedia definition doesn’t seem to agree with what you’re saying.

                  • jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    That’s not really a valid argument, as wikipedia is descriptive, not prescriptive. But besides that, yes it does?