• 6 Posts
  • 346 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle













  • No1@aussie.zonetoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldAI is like Temu for thinking
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I shit you not:

    The comparison between AI and Temu as a metaphor for thinking highlights a paradox: while AI systems, like the e-commerce platform Temu, are built on vast data and sophisticated algorithms, their “thinking” is fundamentally different from human cognition. Temu uses AI to personalize shopping by analyzing user behavior, showing products based on clicks and basket additions, creating a highly efficient, addictive experience that mirrors how AI models learn from data. Similarly, large language models (LLMs) are trained on massive internet text, learning to predict the next word by adjusting internal connections—much like Temu’s algorithms refine product recommendations in real time. However, this process is not genuine understanding. Just as Temu’s AI can generate absurd imagery, such as a trailer-hitch-shaped camper, which reflects a failure to grasp real-world physics or context, LLMs can produce plausible-sounding text that lacks true comprehension or experience. The AI’s “thought” is a statistical simulation, not a conscious or experiential process. As one researcher noted, AI is not self-aware and has no idea of what it is doing, operating purely through probability-based decisions without any internal model of reality. While both Temu and AI systems appear intelligent by generating tailored, seemingly coherent outputs, they do so by manipulating patterns in data rather than engaging in genuine reasoning or understanding. This is why some critics describe LLMs as “stochastic parrots” that mimic language without comprehension. In essence, AI’s “thinking” is like Temu’s interface: highly optimized, responsive, and persuasive, but ultimately rooted in pattern recognition, not insight.

    AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.

    Yeah, nah. We are all fucked.







  • I’m for high, mid and low density housing, as appropriate. One of the pieces to improve housing affordability has to be to increase housing supply and therefore also density.

    But I’m real worried about the infrastructure and services being available to match the increased population levels. Even if you just look at cars for some of the planned suburbs, the roads are already clogged. What is adding another 100K cars to that high density area going to do?

    And calling a small area between four residential towers a ‘square’ won’t work.

    I’m turning into a NIMBY and I don’t even have a BY!